Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
A positive or explanatory statement in the humanities and psychology is about what "is," "was" or "will be," and does not involve any impression of acceptance or rejection.
The positive explanation is supported by empirical evidence. For eg, "A rise in taxes would lead to less usage" and "A decrease in fuel production would cause an increase to its value."
Positive assumptions are commonly used to explain the observable, such as the inflation rate in a country. These are primarily used to explain hypotheses and principles.
Answer:
"Mexico" is the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
- Throughout the case of Mexican individuals, what and when to talk in the discussions or conferences is punctual.
- Furthermore, you wouldn't overlook the little characteristics because doing so would generate misunderstanding or some complications. You mention as well as continue to talk all about that at the conference.
Answer:
The explicit cost of flight includes cost of fuel, maintenance cost, payment to pilot.
Explanation:
The explicit costs are the direct costs incurred during the process of production or business. Here, the payments made to the pilot will be a variable cost, the cost of fuel, etc will be explicit cost.
The marginal explicit cost is the increase in the explicit cost with an additional output. The incremental cost of flight correctly determines the marginal explicit cost.
Opportunity cost is the cost of sacrificing the alternative. Here, the marginal opportunity cost will be the revenue that the firm would have earned by renting the flight to other firms or individuals.
Answer:
A) NPV= - $428,888.89 B) Company would break Even if g = 5.68%
Explanation:
Hi, we have to bring to present value all the inflows and outflows of cash, this is the formula to use and the math of it.


The question says that "at what constant growth rate would the company just break even..." and well, a NPV=0 is not precisely break even, actually, it means that the company is obtaining exactly what is asking for any investment, but let´s assume that the question was, what should the growth rate be for the company to accept this project?. So we have to solve the first equation for "g", that is:

So the constant growth rate has to be at least 5.68% for the company to accept this project (NPV=0)
Best of luck
Answer:
The reutrn on equity should be of 9.53%
Explanation:
We can solve the return on equity by considering the gordon model of dividend growth:
current dividends 2 dollars
next year dividends: current x (1 + g) = 2 x (1 + 0.06) = 2.12
Ke = 0.09533 = 9.53%