1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rus_ich [418]
2 years ago
10

When the u. S. Congress passes federal statutes, states are not obligated to follow them. True or false?.

Law
1 answer:
GrogVix [38]2 years ago
5 0

This statement is <u>false</u>. Acts, usually referred to as statutes in U.S., are laws adopted by a legislature. Once the legislature passed a federal statute, all states must implement and obey them.

The laws passed by U.S. Congress—typically with the President's assent—known as federal statutes have three forms to disseminate:

  • First release as a slip law or paginated pamphlets

  • Arranged according to law number

  • Inclusion of a codification in the US Code or earlier versions

All states are obligated to follow these forms. Federal slip laws, session laws, and codified laws must also be accessible to U.S. people through print and electronic means.

Learn more about a state constitutional provision that has conflicts with a federal statute: brainly.com/question/13476156

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
What is evidence-based criminology? How does the meaning of the word evidence in evidence-based criminology differ from the evid
Vesna [10]
Can you show me a picture of your work, or maybe use brainly’s quick answers
7 0
3 years ago
Three main sources of international law
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

Sources of international law include treaties, international customs, general widely recognized principles of law, the decisions of national and lower courts, and scholarly writings.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Does spending the most money usually result in an election victory?
Maurinko [17]

Answer:

The candidate who spends the most money usually wins

Explanation:

5 0
1 year ago
f two people of different ethnic backgrounds were guilty of the same crime, but only one of them were accused and tried, this wo
Anestetic [448]

Answer:

It would be a violation of the due process and the equal protection under the law.

Explanation:

The fourteenth amendement is based on the conventional interpretation that "justice is blind" and that it should be administered without the implications of race, gender, religious beliefs or ethnicity.

3 0
3 years ago
Can you sue someone for urinating on your wife?
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

Yes!

Explanation:

You can sue anybody for anything as long as the judge accepts it.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements about the partnership is TRUE? *
    7·1 answer
  • The speaker argues that just because these men have been locked up, they shouldn't be locked out of their kids' lives. Do you ag
    8·1 answer
  • I was lead to believe that Democracy was rule by the majority, that members of parliament were there to represent the wishes of
    11·1 answer
  • The amount of nicotine contained in a single pack of cigarettes is enough to __________ an adult when consumed quickly enough.
    7·1 answer
  • The penal code section for sex registration is
    6·1 answer
  • Please i need to submit it right now .I NEED HELPPPP
    5·2 answers
  • Take my money ok just do it
    6·1 answer
  • 5
    7·2 answers
  • Judges on the court of appeals
    15·1 answer
  • Application letter for Malawi army recruitment
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!