When the u. S. Congress passes federal statutes, states are not obligated to follow them. True or false?.

1 answer:

5 0

This statement is <u>false</u>. Acts, usually referred to as statutes in U.S., are laws adopted by a legislature. Once the legislature passed a federal statute, all states must implement and obey them.

The laws passed by U.S. Congress—typically with the President's assent—known as federal statutes have three forms to disseminate:

First release as a slip law or paginated pamphlets

Arranged according to law number

Inclusion of a codification in the US Code or earlier versions

All states are obligated to follow these forms. Federal slip laws, session laws, and codified laws must also be accessible to U.S. people through print and electronic means.

Learn more about a state constitutional provision that has conflicts with a federal statute: brainly.com/question/13476156

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

What drugs are commonly abused?

irakobra [83]

Answer:

Marijuana (not prescribed), Cocaine, Opiates, Methamphetamine, Alcohol, prescription medications, heroin and ecstasy.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why might the government not want to give lawyers to every single person accused of any

marin [14]

Answer:

A lawyer should not accept representation in a matter unless it can be performed competently, promptly, without improper conflict of interest and to completion. Ordinarily, a representation in a matter is completed when the agreed-upon assistance has been concluded.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Which provision of the U.S. Constitution clarifies conflicts between the laws of a state and the laws of the nation?

mrs_skeptik [129]

C) Supremacy clause :)

7 0

3 years ago

What if the defendant later admits that they did in fact kill the victim. Are they getting away with murder or could there be an

Sveta_85 [38]

There are other options in the case when defendant admits to the crime (of killing the victim)

Explanation:

In case the defendant accepts to have committed the crime of killing the victim, he can be given a thought of receiving some leniency in the punishment.

The counsel of the concerned defendant can argue in the court of law, that act was in a fit of rage, or haste of anger and was entirely not pre-meditated. He can further arague that feeling guilt of the crime, the defendant admitted to his crime hence he should be subjected to a lenient term.

4 0

3 years ago

The Case of ...

ratelena [41]

Answer:

its b kdkdkdkdkdkdksdjdjd

3 0

3 years ago