1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kompoz [17]
2 years ago
8

What was the conflict between the nationalist party (the kuomintang) and the communist party from the early 1900s to 1950 ?

History
1 answer:
Elenna [48]2 years ago
4 0

The Chinese Civil War was fought between the Kuomintang (KMT)-led government of the Republic of China (ROC) and forces of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), lasting intermittently after 1927.

By 1949, the KMT had been decisively defeated by the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) in the Chinese Civil War , and the ROC government had withdrawn to Taiwan, a former Qing territory annexed by the Empire of Japan from 1895 to 1945.

The war is generally divided into two phases with an interlude: from August 1927 to 1937, the KMT-CCP Alliance collapsed during the Northern Expedition, and the Nationalists controlled most of China. From 1937 to 1945.

To know more about Chinese Civil War here

brainly.com/question/3440995

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Do you know this for social studies
inna [77]

Hey there!

Surrounded means to be encircled.

If this helps, please mark me as brainliest!

Have a great day!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What issue was the Kansas Nebraska act supposedly going to settle
Nonamiya [84]
The <span>Kansas Nebraska act was supposedly going to settle the issue of "slavery" in the United States by leaving the decision up to "popular sovereignty". It ultimately failed, however. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes how Totalitarianism differs from Authoritarianism? Select all that apply.
Nostrana [21]

Totalitarianism controls all aspects of social and institutional life

Authoritarianism allows for some degree of social freedom.

Authoritarianism allows for some degree of social freedom.

Explanation:

  • Totalitarianism is a political regime based on a pervasive ideology and terror that controls all areas of human life.
  • Often, totalitarianism is mistakenly compared and equated with forms of government such as dictatorship, tyranny, despotism, autocratic regimes, etc.
  • Political science finds a significant substantive difference between them. According to the most influential analyst of the emergence of H. Arendt, totalitarianism is a unique political phenomenon that emerged in the 1930s.
  • One of the key differences between totalitarianism and similar regimes is that these regimes retain state structure, while totalitarianism, although in some places retains state form, abolishes the logic of the state (distinguishing power from civil society) and establishes the rule of an organization (party) with which it is indoctrinated. the mass fully identifies.

Learn more on Totalitarianism on

brainly.com/question/470339

brainly.com/question/4044930

brainly.com/question/2418241

brainly.com/question/8118634

#learnwithBrainly

8 0
3 years ago
How are state Supreme Court justices selected? What are some arguments both 'for' and 'against' each method?
Ronch [10]

Answer: Partisan, non-partisan and gubernatorial appointment

Explanation:

They are various ways supreme Court Justice are selected. Some of the ways are by partisan election, non-partisan election, or gubernatorial appointment. These varies according to the different states. The partisan method of election is a method where candidates are being voted for through ballot boxes with an indication of their political party. This is preferable among others as it gives the other judges the power to choose whom they want. Non-partisan is the opposite of it, while gubernatorial appointment is the situation where the executive arm of the government get to select for everyone, there is always a bias to this.

Partisan election of judges is a selection method where candidates are listed on the ballot with an indication of their political party

3 0
3 years ago
What issues aroused the vigorous debate over the ratification of the constitution?
Arlecino [84]
The primary issue that surrounded the vigorous debate over the ratification of the constitution was if this new document was going to give the federal government too much power over individuals and the states, with the Federalists saying no and the Anti-Federalists saying yes. The states didn't want this new government to be able to tax them or regulate their currencies. 
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Maddie is writing a paper on Oklahoma exploration for history class. She has already used the word "expedition" several times an
    6·1 answer
  • Why is 1930's a significant year to canada
    7·1 answer
  • Only 18 please I'm very confused
    13·2 answers
  • What was most prevalent propaganda media form?
    7·2 answers
  • In addition to the boll weevil, what other natural disaster greatly affected cotton farmers in the 1920s?
    5·2 answers
  • Which was a result of the treaty of Oregon in 1846
    5·2 answers
  • Which group was NOT a target for racism in the United States during World War II?
    13·2 answers
  • One important advantage the South had over the North was a. they were financially more stable because they had more factories an
    10·1 answer
  • How were people in the middle colonies different from those in the New England and southern colonies?
    11·1 answer
  • One
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!