1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hichkok12 [17]
2 years ago
7

How are state Supreme Court justices selected? What are some arguments both 'for' and 'against' each method?

History
1 answer:
Ronch [10]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: Partisan, non-partisan and gubernatorial appointment

Explanation:

They are various ways supreme Court Justice are selected. Some of the ways are by partisan election, non-partisan election, or gubernatorial appointment. These varies according to the different states. The partisan method of election is a method where candidates are being voted for through ballot boxes with an indication of their political party. This is preferable among others as it gives the other judges the power to choose whom they want. Non-partisan is the opposite of it, while gubernatorial appointment is the situation where the executive arm of the government get to select for everyone, there is always a bias to this.

Partisan election of judges is a selection method where candidates are listed on the ballot with an indication of their political party

You might be interested in
In the early 1800s, most women did not:
Semmy [17]

Answer:

All of the above

Explanation:

they only got their rights in 1920

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best describes "juba"? Juba was a form of religion practiced mostly by early Native Americans that includ
Helga [31]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is required for an adult male to become a citizen of Roman?
Lilit [14]
To be a freed slave, being born in Rome, and by naturalization (by petitioning for citizenship of foreign-born)
4 0
3 years ago
What is radical government formed in France that sought far-reaching changes
mylen [45]
<span>National convention.....
</span>
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
King James I was considered a good king and did not believe in Divine Right of Kings
son4ous [18]
The answer is false. King James strongly believed in the Divine Right of Kings.
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Champlain is primarily known for
    14·1 answer
  • Confucianism and daoism (a) were officially sanctioned doctrines of the qin and han emperors. (b) are religions, which developed
    9·1 answer
  • What the historian using the historical thinking skill of chronological thinking?
    14·1 answer
  • Taken literally what did the term lay investiture mean to medieval christans in the 11th century
    5·1 answer
  • Why were banks the focus of attention early in the First New Deal? (7 points)
    6·1 answer
  • Which communist nation remained independent of soviet control
    8·1 answer
  • What is a stock exchange?
    10·1 answer
  • List of primary arguments of the critics and defenders of the constitution
    7·2 answers
  • For what reasons do these critics of President Truman‟s decision oppose the use of the atomic bomb
    5·1 answer
  • What skills does Northup possess?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!