Answer 2 is the best choice
Answer:
The cost of the work transferred-out during May is $18,630
Explanation:
For computing the cost of work transferred, first we have to compute the conversion cost per unit and material cost per unit
The conversion cost per uni = Conversion cost ÷ (transferred units + work in progress)
= $11,160 ÷ (2,700 + 300 × 30%)
= $11,160 ÷ (2,700 + 90)
= $11,160 ÷ 2,790
= $4 per unit
Now, material cost per unit = Material cost ÷ (transferred units + work in progress)
= $8,700 ÷ (2,700+300)
= $8700 ÷ 3,000
= $2.9 per unit
So, total cost of the work transferred is equals to
= Transferred units × conversion cost per unit + transferred units × material cost per unit
= 2,700 × $4 + 2,700 × $2.9
= $10,800 + $7,830
= $18,630
Hence, the cost of the work transferred-out during May is $18,630
Answer:
the correct option is C) If many firms enter the computer software industry and consequently bid up the price of programmers, then: the long-run industry supply curve will slope downward.
Explanation:
When many firm enter an industry, there is competition and the presence of multiple players will eventually cause the cost of production to decline.
In the short run, if many firms enter the computer software industry and consequently bid up the price of programmers, then the increase in participation will increase the number of software developed.
In the long run, industry supply curve will slop downwards indicating a price reduction.
Answer: D) As stated in our contract,we are liable to pay compensation only when our personnel repair the equipment
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the best way to phrase the refusal of Marie's claim for adjustment is that "As stated in our contract, we are liable to pay compensation only when our personnel repair the equipment".
Since a service executive in the company discovers that the mower was dismantled by someone, then Marie's claim for adjustment can be refused since it wasn't dismantled by someone from the company.
Answer:
C. Compensatory damages and consequential damages.
Explanation:
The reason is that the company can only sue Santa for its compensatory damage of paying 15% extra and consequential damages which are only claimable if the party to contract knows that not performing the contract will contribute to consequential damages which are here losses of sales which amount to 25% of sales.
