1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viva [34]
1 year ago
7

in 1949, a german court was asked to decide the following case: in 1944, a woman denounced her husband to the authorities for in

sulting remarks he had made about hitler while on leave from the army. while the wife was under no legal duty to report him, the husband’s insulting remarks constituted a crime under the german code of 1871, which had remained in force during the nazi era. the husband was found guilty of violating the law and sentenced to death. despite this sentence, the husband was sentenced to the eastern front. following the war, he returned and instituted proceedings against his wife for illegally depriving him of his liberty. the wife’s defense was that she had acted in accordance with the law and, therefore, had not committed any crime. the court convicted the wife of illegally depriving her husband of her liberty, which was a crime under the 1871 penal code because the nazi laws contrary to justice.
History
1 answer:
svlad2 [7]1 year ago
4 0

A hearing has already been held at which it changed into determined that Jim ought to be back to his proprietor. Jim's legal professional has, but, objected to those proceedings and the case has come earlier than you on enchantment and by way of unique writ. Jim's legal professional contends that the hearing became a mockery of justice.

The Fugitive Slave Acts have been virtually enacted to present impact on this Constitutional provision. certainly, Jim's proprietor has critical doubts about whether or not this appeal is even prison since the Fugitive Slave Acts clearly required a hearing. That listening to has now been held and all the approaches exact by way of Congress and inside the Acts had been observed to the letter.

The Federal Constitutional court docket Germa listen abbreviated  BVerfG is the ultimate constitutional court docket for the Federal Republic of Germany, mounted by the charter or primary regulation Grundgesetz of Germany. each of the two sub-courts has eight individuals. the first sub-court known as Senat deals largely with civil rights problems.

Learn more about The following case here:-brainly.com/question/12818888

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
In what ways is the house closer to the people than the senate
Reil [10]
 It has always been elected directly by the people, an. It has always been smaller than the House, with a membership not proportional to the .U.S. Congress.
8 0
4 years ago
What was one way Americans fought against the growth of mexican immigration
jarptica [38.1K]
By supporting causes to make sure mexican immagration did not happen
7 0
3 years ago
Who did the vietnamese trung sisters lead an uprising against in 39<br> c.e?
Nutka1998 [239]
Han rulers.

(From wikipedia)The Chinese traditional historical accounts on the Trưng sisters are remarkably brief. They are found in two different chapters of the Book of the Later Han<span>, the history for the </span>Eastern Han Dynasty<span>, against which the Trưng sisters had carried out their uprising.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Magna Carta required O even the king of England to obey the laws of the land the king to serve as judge and jury for those a
Anna [14]

Answer: Even the king of England to obey the laws of the land

Explanation:

The very famous Magna Carter was a document issued by King John in 1215 as a peace agreement between the Crown and rebel Barons. Drawn up by the Archbishop of Canterbury, it established that everyone in England, including the King were subject to the laws of the land and cannot act above it.

This document served and serves as a cornerstone of the British Constitution.

5 0
3 years ago
"Laissez Faire", as described by Alexis de Tocqueville, refers to - A - the government interfering in the economy (the business
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

A - the government interfering in the economy (the business community)

Explanation:

"Laissez Faire" refers to the economic system in which transaction is absent between private parties and this is done by the government. The government interfere in the economy by making regulations on the private parties. Laissez Faire is good for economic growth but not good for business community. The  business community thinks that if there is less involvement of government in the economy, the better will be our business.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the great migration contribute to social unrest in the us after world war 1
    14·1 answer
  • What military strategies did the united states employ in vietnam?
    6·1 answer
  • How does the travelogue genre best support Polo's purpose for writing? A travelogue persuades readers to visit far-off lands. A
    6·3 answers
  • WHO IS THE GOAT IN THE NFL
    14·2 answers
  • Why do you think Johnny and pony boy turn to dally for help? Does he help them?
    10·1 answer
  • Citizens of the United States can lose their natural right to liberty if they
    11·2 answers
  • What social effect did the black death have on europe
    11·2 answers
  • If America and North Korea went to war, who would win economically and politically?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain the significance of choosing the 49th parallel as the boundary between Canada and the United States.
    9·2 answers
  • When was the korean war.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!