1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viva [34]
1 year ago
7

in 1949, a german court was asked to decide the following case: in 1944, a woman denounced her husband to the authorities for in

sulting remarks he had made about hitler while on leave from the army. while the wife was under no legal duty to report him, the husband’s insulting remarks constituted a crime under the german code of 1871, which had remained in force during the nazi era. the husband was found guilty of violating the law and sentenced to death. despite this sentence, the husband was sentenced to the eastern front. following the war, he returned and instituted proceedings against his wife for illegally depriving him of his liberty. the wife’s defense was that she had acted in accordance with the law and, therefore, had not committed any crime. the court convicted the wife of illegally depriving her husband of her liberty, which was a crime under the 1871 penal code because the nazi laws contrary to justice.
History
1 answer:
svlad2 [7]1 year ago
4 0

A hearing has already been held at which it changed into determined that Jim ought to be back to his proprietor. Jim's legal professional has, but, objected to those proceedings and the case has come earlier than you on enchantment and by way of unique writ. Jim's legal professional contends that the hearing became a mockery of justice.

The Fugitive Slave Acts have been virtually enacted to present impact on this Constitutional provision. certainly, Jim's proprietor has critical doubts about whether or not this appeal is even prison since the Fugitive Slave Acts clearly required a hearing. That listening to has now been held and all the approaches exact by way of Congress and inside the Acts had been observed to the letter.

The Federal Constitutional court docket Germa listen abbreviated  BVerfG is the ultimate constitutional court docket for the Federal Republic of Germany, mounted by the charter or primary regulation Grundgesetz of Germany. each of the two sub-courts has eight individuals. the first sub-court known as Senat deals largely with civil rights problems.

Learn more about The following case here:-brainly.com/question/12818888

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
What was true about Jackie Robinson?
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

C. He suffered bad treatment but led the way for others.

Explanation:

Jackie Robinson was the first African American to play Major League baseball outside of a segregated black league, in 1947. He became a living milestone for racial equality and changed the sport of baseball forever.

5 0
3 years ago
What does this political cartoon indicate? A. Europeans and Japanese wanted to expand their empires. B. China controlled Europea
Mazyrski [523]
The answer is A.......
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Bibienas were the most influential Italian designers of the 18th century. Spanning three generations, seven members of the f
erik [133]

Answer:

Introduction of baroque art

Explanation:

The Bibienas were the most influential Italian designers of the 18th century. Spanning three generations, seven members of the family were scenic designers. One of the three major innovations by them was: the introduction of baroque art.

The Baroque is a style of architecture, music, dance, painting, sculpture and other arts that flourished in Europe from the early 17th century until the 1740s( Wikipedia)

Bibienas family three major innovation : the introduction of baroque art, vast scale and elaborate ornamentation and use of angle perspective.

3 0
3 years ago
What was the ruling in the 1874 Supreme Court Case Minor v. Happersett?A.that voting was not a basic right of citizens, therefor
Sladkaya [172]
Your answer is A. That voting was not a basic right of citizens, therefore Women could be denied the right to vote. Hope this helps! :)
3 0
3 years ago
America's founders enacted the Fifth Amendment to repeal habeas corpus.<br> True<br> False
UNO [17]
False
The founding fathers enacted the fifth amendment so that everyone accused of a crime had the opportunity to prove their innocence.
Habeas Corpus is “a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court, especially to secure the person’s release unless lawful grounds are shown for their detention”
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Rome motivate conquered peoples to pay taxes, supply soldiers, and stay loyal to the government?
    7·2 answers
  • The essential purpose of president kennedy's promise to land a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s was to
    6·1 answer
  • To what extent did anti-Protestantism contribute to Louis XIV's downfall?
    9·1 answer
  • In what ways had the United States begun fighting World War 2 before it was attacked
    9·1 answer
  • Who said twice the pride double the fall in revenge of the sith
    12·1 answer
  • Why did humans fear Zeus' wrath?
    14·1 answer
  • In which area did the Freedmen’s Bureau have the most success for African Americans?
    9·1 answer
  • Name a group that opposed the concept of Manifest Destiny? *
    11·1 answer
  • What were two changes suggested by the Chartists?
    12·1 answer
  • The __ are in the northern part of India​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!