If an observation is made in the correct way, its meaning is straightforward and is not subject to interpretation: False.
<h3>What is a scientific observation?</h3>
A scientific observation can be defined as an active acquisition of knowledge (information) through one of the sense organs, while using scientific tools and instruments during an experiment.
<h3>The types of scientific observation.</h3>
In Science, there are two main types of scientific observation and these include the following:
- Qualitative observation
- Quantitative observation
As a general rule, the meaning of any observation isn't straightforward and shall be subjected to interpretation even if it was made in the correct way, as this would help to determine its factualness, authenticity and distinguish it from an hypothesis.
Read more on scientific observation here: brainly.com/question/24137634
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
If an observation is made in the correct way, its meaning is straightforward and is not subject to interpretation: True or False.
Langston Hughes was an American artist, author, dramatist and short story essayist. Hughes was one of the journalists and craftsmen whose work was known as the Harlem Renaissance.
Hughes grew up as a helpless kid from Missouri, the relative of African individuals who had been taken to America as slaves. Around then, the term utilized for African-Americans was "negro" which implies an individual with dark skin. Most "negroes" didn't recall or consider their connection with the individuals of Africa, despite the fact that it was a major effect on their way of life and, specifically, their music. Hughes was bizarre for his time, since he returned to West Africa to see more about his own way of life. Through his verse, plays, and stories, Hughes helped other dark Americans to consider themselves to be essential for an a lot greater gathering of individuals, so now the expression "African-American" is utilized proudly.
Answer:
The correct answer is that contention between social gatherings is a definitely repeating unavoidable truth and that the objective of compromise is to keep clashes diverted inside a lot of concurred standards that encourage serene talk of contrasts, banish savagery as a methods for settling questions, and build up rules for the constrained sorts of brutality that are overlooked (e.g., as discipline for infringement of codes of criminal lead).
This could lead to stress and employee conflict. The reason why it may lead to stress because instead of focusing on work, the individual is force to deal with things that are out of his or her line of work which would lead the person to be stressed. Employee conflict is also another factor because other employees may complain about the individual's doing as he or she wasn't doing his or her part in work.
Answer:
Both players could achieve a better outcome if they successfully collude.
Explanation:
