Answer:
the answer would D have a nice day:)
Explanation:
because the Senate tries the accuse which means no person should be convicted without Concurrence.
Answer:
i took this test and it is
Explanation:
and i believe its....... 3 :/ tell me if im wrong
<span>Since Elizabeth lived in fifteenth century belgium and she had symptoms of what would now be diagnosed as schizophrenia plus the fact that she could not care for herself and her family abandoned her, Elizabeth will most likely die and she could die in many ways.
15th century Belgium is known as the battleground of Europe. Living in this place with or without </span>schizophrenia will leave you dead with either 3rd degree burns or stray bullet in the head. Plus the people in this time are fond of witch-hunting. If you show signs of abnormality, they might think you are a witch or possessed and eitherway, you'll be killed or might unfortunately die in exorcism. Poor Elizabeth.
Answer: Native indigenous peoples of southern Quebec and eastern Ontario.
Explanation:
A tribe whose communities still exist today, nine communities in Quebec and one in Ontario. The French colonists converted a large number of these people to Christianity. Today, a large number of adherents in tribal communities combine their original religion with Catholicism. Throughout colonial history, they were known as fur traders. In such circumstances, they also waged war with neighboring indigenous tribes over the competition in the trade field.
Answer:
<em>I can see that there are no choices.</em>
fallacy of bandwagon
Explanation:
A "logical fallacy" refers to the error of reasoning or logical gap that makes an argument invalid.
The situation above commits the fallacy of the bandwagon because the argument is being supported only according to a significant number of population. This is a fallacy because it doesn't necessarily mean all of the retired persons are unhappy about the level of Social Security assistance due to the opinion of 30 persons who agreed that they were unhappy. It becomes a "standalone justification" of the validity of an argument. We cannot judge the happiness or unhappiness of all retired persons according only to a group of 30 persons <em>(even though they were chosen from different parts of the country). </em>
So, this explains the answer.
