The degree to which someone's personality and values align with the organizational culture of a firm is called person-organization fit.
<h3>What is person-organization fit?</h3>
Person-organization (PO) fit is defined as the compatibility between people and organizations, which occurs when at least one entity provides what the other requires.
The main idea of person-organization fit is that people experience fit when they adopt goal pursuit strategies or engage in activities in a manner that matches their self with organization's goal.
Hence, the degree to which someone's personality and values align with the organizational culture of a firm is called person-organization fit.
Learn more about person-organization fit here : brainly.com/question/25922351
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
Godiva is a well known chocolate shop and Hershey is renowned all over the world. To take over the market control both have divided consumers into different categories, e.g. luxury of buying chocolates versus cost-conscious who are willing to pay a subsequent amount only and those who are looking for quick energy boost so good labeling than those looking for a gift to loved ones so better outlook, although both have industries in the same market.
Answer:
The Actual overhead in finished goods is $ 113,400
Explanation:
In order to calculate the ACTUAL OVERHEAD IN FINISHED GOODS we would have to use the following formula:
Actual overhead in finished goods= overheads allocated to job 18 and 19 + underapplied overheads allocated finished inventory
Actual overhead in finished goods=(($9,750+$13,650)/($11,700+$9,750+$13,650+$3,900)*$168,000) + ($23,400/$39,000* ($189,000 - ($39,000*$168,000/$35,000))
= $112,320 + $1,080
= $ 113,400
The Actual overhead in finished goods is $ 113,400
Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available
