Answer:
closest to: B) $7777
Explanation:
NPV ( net presetn value) cashflow - investment
<u>cost savings present value (ordinary annuity):</u>
C $8,500
time 5 years
rate 0.12
PV $30,640.5977
salvage value present value:
Salvage $2,000
time 5
rate 0.12
PV 1,134.85
NPV: 30,640.60 + 1,134.85 - 24,000 = 7,775.45
Answer:
2. second-price, sealed-bid auction.
Explanation:
In the given situation, it is mentioned that there is 25 risk -neutral bidders that contains the affiliated values and the same is to be allocated between $0 and $500 million
So, here the type of an action that could maximize the expected revenue is the second price i.e. sealed bid auction as in this the bidder provides the maximum price that received the good in the second maximum price
Therefore, the second option is correct
Given:
salary: <span>$10.50 an hour
25 hours a week
expenses:
Cellphone bill: $65/month
car insurance: $1,200/yr
*20% taxes.
There is no specific question but I will solve for Marcus net earnings for the year.
25 hours/week * 52 weeks/yr = 1,300 hours/year
Wages: 10.50 per hour * 1,300 hours/year = $13,650 Gross salary per year
Taxes: 13,650 * 20% = 2,730
13,650 - 2,730 = 10,920 net salary for the year
Cell phone bill: 65 per month * 12 months = 780
Net salary: 10,920
Cell phone bill (780)
Car insurance: <u> (1,200)</u>
Net Income: 8,940 per annum.
</span>
Answer:
Ruby should go to college.
Explanation:
Ruby is currently 50 years old and earning $50,000 per year.
She would like to retire at 67.
She is thinking of going back to college, to complete a graduate degree.
After completing a graduate degree from the college she would earn $55,000.
The total cost of a graduate degree is $75,000.
Ruby still has 17 years to work and earn.
Her income will increase by $5,000 after college
The increase in income earned after college until retirement
= $5,000 
17
= $85,000
Since the increase in income is greater than the cost of going to college, Ruby should go to college.
The distribution of income in the United States has become less equal over the last 20 years. This means that the difference between the rich and the poor has grown. It could mean that the rich have started getting more money while the poor get what they used to get, or even less. In any case, the gap between their income has changed greatly during this time period.
