Answer:
i think it should result in more disagreements
Explanation:
it is based on real life because when asked certain questions people would have very serious opinions
Answer:
Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God. Whether the independence of the continent was declared too soon, or delayed too long, I will not now enter into as an argument; my own simple opinion is, that had it been eight months earlier, it would have been much better.
Explanation:
Short Summary: Richard (Gloucester) informs the audience of his emotional state and his plan to take over the throne.
Long Summary:
Richard III, at this point just the Duke of Gloucester, comes out to give the audience some insight into his state of mind and also the actions that have been happening before the play started. Even though the kingdom is in a state of peace, Richard isn't happy about it. He shares with the audience his plan to dethrone his brother (Edward IV), the current king, so that he can become king himself. The first thing he plans is to use rumors to make Edward (who is ill) suspicious of Clarence, their other brother.
Clarence enters, surrounded by guards because Richard's rumors have started to take hold, to be escorted to the Tower of London to be imprisoned. Richard uses this conversation to pretend he feels bad for Clarence and suggest that the rumors were started by Edward's wife Elizabeth or his mistress Lady Shore. He says to Clarence that he is going to try to get him free, but then when Clarence leaves he says to the audience that he is so happy to see him in prison.
Lord Hastings is the next to enter, just recently freed from the Tower. Richard informs him that Edward is sick and when Hastings leaves Richard tells the audience how happy he is about Edward's illness. He needs Clarence to die first so that he becomes the legal heir, then when Edward dies he will take the throne. Additionally, Richard wants to convince Lady Anne to marry him. His family was responsible for killing her previous husband (Henry VI, the former king), but Richard is excited to get her to marry him anyway.
The rhetorical device that was used by Justice Harlan in the sentence provided is;
Alliteration is the occurrence of the same or similar sounding letters in a group of closely linked words. The initial consonant sounds are stressed in the usage of this device.
In the excerpt provided, we find here, the repetition of the consonant sound, 's'. This can be found in words such as; knows, statute, question, purpose, so, persons, etc.
The repetition of the 's' sound adds rhythm and emphasis to the speech.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/21825251
A good book review will:
- Point out strengths and weaknesses in the book
- Looks at what the author intended to do and whether or not he did it
- Be between 50 and 1,500 words
The following is a guide to writing a book review; but, you need to know that they are just suggestions to think about.
- Write down a summary of essential information, like title, author, copyright date, kind of book, price, subject matter of the book, and special features.
- State the reason the author wrote the book.
- Consider from what point of view the book was written.
- Decide what the author was trying to accomplish.
- Determine what kind of book is it, and who is the intended audience.
- Discuss the author's style of writing and look at his cohesion, clarity, flow of the text, and use of precise words.
- Think about how you were affected by the book and if any of your opinions or feelings change because of it.
- Decide if the book met its goal and whether or not you would recommend it to others and why.
- State the main topic of the book and the author's treatment of it. Also explain the development of the thesis, using quotes or references.
- Discuss the author's descriptions and narration, pointing out whether he explained facts or tried to persuade the readers of the validity of an issue.
- Analyze whether or not the book suited its intended audience and if it was interesting and thorough.
- You may challenge his opinions and explain why you disagree with them. Include any information about the author that would establish his authority or that would be relevant to the review.
