Answer:
<em>- Separation does not necessarily create inequality. </em>
<em>-Laws that permit separation can be constitutional. </em>
Explanation:
Justice Brown's message in this excerpt is about the legal case of Brown v. Board of Education on Segregation/Separation of black kids from white kids in US schools.
A black girl called Linda Brown had her entrance denied to a school of white kids and her father appealed to the Court, they ruled a “separate but equal” doctrine, which admitted that laws could allow the separation of black and white people in facilities and places, as long as the places were equal. In this view the separating laws did not create inequality and neither violate the constitution.
Years later the case had a huge impact and helped ending legal segregation in the United States.
On September 1, 1939, Hitler invaded Poland from the west; two<span> days later, France and Britain declared </span>war <span>on Germany, beginning </span>World War II<span>. On September 17, Soviet troops invaded Poland from the east.</span>
The best answer is:
"To make sure that other citizens get fair trials."
They help bring opinions and supervise the trial. They have a say in what happens in a court case- this is important. They can bring different points of view and make sure the judge, or people in the trial, aren't being biased or using uncredible facts or information.
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
