Answer: Neo-Corporatism.
Explanation:
Neo- Corporatism emerged in resent times as a successor to State Corporatism. State Corporatism was a system whereby interest and labor groups were supposed to work together for the good of society. These were most prevalent in authoritarian regimes like Nazi Germany and post communist Lithuania.
Recently though, in some Democratic countries, interest groups have chosen to work with the Government to improve the lives of the people and enable the Government reach out deeper. These Peak Associations as they are often called help the Government compete economically and are very prevalent in countries and regions such as, Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Scandinavia.
Answer: 21%
Explanation: The developer purchased 3 properties and he can buy each property for $20 per square foot.
Therefore: 75 × 110 =8250 square feet.
8250 × $20 = $165 000 per lot.
Each lot was sold for $200 000. Which means the developer made profits of:
$200 000 - $165 000 = $35 000 per lot.
The percentage of profit on each lot is:
Percentage of profit on cost amount:
= 
= 0.2121212 recurring × 100
= 21,21%
Percentage of profit on sale amount:
= 
= 0.175 × 100
= 17,5%
Answer:
an increase in the operating income by $16,322
Explanation:
The computation of the impact in the operating income is given below:
Variable cost of 75 units (1300000 × 75 ÷ 12700) 7,678
Sale price of 75 units (75 × 320) 24,000
Increase in operating income (24000 - 7678) $16,322
hence, the impact in the operating income is that there is an increase in the operating income by $16,322
Answer: A. The VP of customer service is correct. Since the cost was not taken into account at the beginning of the project, the project should not go forward as planned. Project initiation should be revisited to examine the project plan and determine how changes can be made to accommodate customer service. B.
Explanation:
The economic principle of substitution says that when there are two houses in the same neighborhood with the same size, appeal, and utility, the lower-priced one will tend to sell first.
<h3>The economic principle of substitution</h3>
- According to the principle of substitution, the cost of purchasing a substitute that is just as desired tends to establish the upper limit of value, assuming no inopportune delays.
- A shrewd investor would not spend more on an asset that generates income than it would cost to construct or buy an asset of a similar nature.
- According to this theory, the cost of acquiring a comparable substitute property with the same use, design, and revenue determine the maximum value of a property in most cases.
- For instance, why would somebody pay $1,000,000 for a home when they could pay $750,000 for a different but as appealing home in the same neighborhood?
To learn more about the economic principle of substitution refer to:
brainly.com/question/9659517
#SPJ4
