I think that the best answer is: <span>b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
let's look at the options: </span><span>
a. paleo Indians went to war with each other on a large scale due to scarce water resources
- This could be true if it was really hot, but this was not the case. Warming did not mean a really hot climate, but less harsh: so actually, there would be more, not less water resources.
b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
- this is possible ! a warmer climate would mean that there would be more possibility to fish or gather food, which would mean that people didn't have to hunt - and they would not want to hunt big animals, as it's dangerous.
c.paleo Indians faced food shortages that resulted in a lower population
-no, a warmer climate would mean more, not less, food
d.paleo Indians lost land to rising sea level's</span>
-no, they still had a lot of land.
<span>It does not allow the government to handle the important needs such as common currency or taxes on trade goods. Not to mention that because of their Articles of Confederation they cannot elect a chief executive or one official leader</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Social rule can be regarded as set of behavior required to by everyone to follow been a member of the society, this rules are not the same with one that are enforced by law, it serves as guidelines for member of the society
Social rule system involves custom, norms, laws as well as taboos and others that are needed in social science as well as humanity.
Examples of social rules are;
1)personal space of someone should not be invaded
2) maintaining eye contact when one is talking to someone.
The example illustrates the difference in organizational
culture. Organizational culture is being defined as the value that an
individual encompasses by means of having it to contribute to the unique psychological
environment or also, the social environment in an organization by which it exist on both parties but both are being used differently.
They are the Rejected children. They somebody who is unequivocally loathed by his associates. "Rejected children" are one of the five sorts of sociometric statuses, a framework for classifying a kid's social standing in view of associate reactions to that tyke. A few companions may like a "rejected children" to a degree, yet the tyke is only very seldom distinguished as anybody's closest companion.
