Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
739,000 - 219,000 = 520,000
The net assets are assets minus liabilities, so it is $520,000 in this case.
Price ceilings are the limit of the prices to go high above the given ceiling while the price floor limit the prices to go below the given amount. The two restrict the free exchange of prices by putting a range of prices allowable only for a certain product. The prices are already limited between the price floor and the price ceiling.
Answer: A. The other asset group should be tested for an impairment loss before goodwill is tested.
Explanation:
According to the IFRS standards, it is important and necessary to revalue your assets according to their net realizable value, i.e, assets should be reported after deducting accumulated depreciation or amortization in the case of goodwill. In the case of inventory, NRV should be calculated by estimating impairments.
The other asset groups are tested to check for impairment loss and later the goodwill is tested.
