Answer:
d. disparate treatment
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that this scenario best illustrates disparate treatment. This refers to discriminating a potential employee based on any protected characteristic (age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation, marriage) even though they are just as suited or qualified as any other candidate or employee.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The appropriate response is Consent Order. Once the request is fixed it must be changed by shared assent of the now ex and spouse or if another judge chooses it can be changed after an application is made to the court, one individual can't change the terms of the request, it must be by common assent. For most by far of individuals, assent orders are last.
Culture is known to be the way of life of people in a particular place. In cultures that are high in uncertainty avoidance is one where orderliness, consistency, and structure are important.
- Uncertainty avoidance is simply known as the way cultures socialize its people or members to feel in uncertain, novel, surprising, or in surprise situations.
People who have high uncertainty avoidance cultures often capitalizes on strict orderliness and consistency in behavior.
Conclusively, The ability to approach cross-cultural work relationships with a learner mind-set is known to be an attribute of high cultural intelligence.
Learn more about Culture from
brainly.com/question/25010777
Answer:
See answer below
Explanation:
1. Degree of operating leverage
Selling price $126,000
Variable cost $50,400
Contribution margin $75,600
Fixed cost $23,000
Net operating income $52,600
Degree of operating leverage = Contribution margin / operating income = $75,600 / $52,600
= 1.44
Answer: False
Explanation:
A dissenting opinion refers to an opinion in a legal case that's written by the judge(s) who disagree with the court's majority opinion that gives rise to its judgment.
It should be noted that a justice who agrees with the outcome of a case but doesn't agree with the reason that was proffered by other justices can issue a concurring opinion and not a dissenting opinion.
Therefore, the correct option is False.
