Answer:
Specifying the role of price in an organization's marketing and strategic plans.
Explanation:
Pricing objectives can be described as the goals which puts an organization through on ways to place the prices of their products to potential customers. It makes the products more appealing to the customers. Pricing objectives involves determing the appropriate price for a particular good or service.
Pricing objectives helps companies in improving their market shares this is achieved by cutting down the cost of their products to drive customers to purchase them thereby giving the business a high competitive edge in the market.
Answer:
One possible explanation is that the Blimpie franchisor is working properly since the franchisees are not receiving proper training and support in order to operate the franchise.
Another reason is that the Blimpie franchise model is simply not efficient (i.e. bad) and it is really hard to operate properly.
On the side of the franchisees, they might not have sufficient working capital since they budgeted higher revenues or lower costs. The franchisor shares the blame for this situation, since before establishing the franchise, the franchisor should request that the franchisee has enough enough working capital to operate the business properly.
Answer:
correct option is C) price
Explanation:
solution
we know that marketing mix is refer to the all factor and strategy adopted by the company in an order to promoted its product
and price element of marketing mix is create value for the product
so when contribution that reduce price of any product or a good
so it is closely related to price element of the marketing mix
so we can say that donations of un wrapped toy and decrease price the concert present by the community chorus
so correct option is C) price
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the images below.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a 2 sheets with the formulas indications.
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
