Answer:
a.$4
Explanation:
initial price of fish dinner per piece was= $10
no. of fish dinner sold = 5
total initial revenue= 5*10= $50
new price of fish dinner = $9
and now six fish dinners are sold
new revenue= 6*9= $54
therefore the marginal revenue from the sixth dinner sold= 54-50= $4
hence option a is correct
The phrase leader should praise followers in public and punish them in private is really a statement concerning what two important parts of communication?
Answer:
Encoding and Decoding
Explanation:
The two important parts of communication in this situation is known as Encoding and Decoding
Here the Encoding means that the sender that is leader, sends the message that is praise in the public, to an effect, that is using certain symbols including actions, words, etc, such that the receiver can quickly grab the message.
At the same time, with the Decoding, the receiver that is followers quickly understood the message, that is praise in the public or punishment in the private, in a way that the meaning of the message is not lost.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is Encoding and Decoding.
Answer:
a) make well-reasoned conclusions and solutions ; & b) begin jotting down a rough draft right away to capture their ideas.
Explanation:
Effective Business message should be - complete, clear, concise, concrete, correct, courteous, coherent.
Rough draft is good for brainstorming & initial preliminary creation stage of business message. After having a bunch of ideas : its important to well arrange them in a coherent, clear way & giving complete, concise structure. This implies better understanding of conclusions, solutions.
Answer:
Rivercity Coffee Shop
Chad cannot sue Jose. The $10,000 is paid to Jose is a bribe. Since a bribe is not legal, it cannot form the basis for an enforceable contract.
Moreover, the offer by Chad is an antitrust and anti-competition consideration that is legally frowned upon. illegal contract
Explanation:
For a contract to be enforceable, it cannot be illegal. A bribe is illegal. The basis for the contract is illegal. Therefore, Chad cannot sue Jose. Since Jose decided to breach the contract, neither Chad nor Jose is entitled to any compensation. Jose cannot be held liable for non-performance.