Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Arbitration and mediation are two alternative ways of resolving legal conflicts, that is, they are alternatives to judicial litigation.
Thus, arbitration involves the selection of an impartial third party (similar to a judge), who will decide through an award who of the parties is right, basing his decision on law, morals, ethics or common sense.
For its part, mediation involves a negotiation between the parties, assisted by a third party, the mediator, who will seek to reach an agreement.
Both alternatives imply that a lawsuit is not initiated, which in itself entails a notable economic and time saving for the parties in conflict.
i dont know, it could really be any thing tbh
Answer:
<u>A) $4.67</u>
Explanation:
In a perfectly competitive market, marginal revenue always is equal to price. Also, the price is not determined by the firms, it is given by the market because producers doesn´t have any power of decision in this matter.
Due to that, the price is constant, independent the quantity sold.
With stocks of 8% for A and 16% for B, The global minimum variance is given as 10.5 percent
<h3>How to solve for the variance</h3>
The expected return of the stock for the country a is given as 0.05
The Weight of this country's stock market WA = 0.5
The expected return of the stock for the country a is given as 0.16
The Weight of this country's stock market Wb = 0.5
Expected Return of the portfolio can be calculated as
= (WA x RA) + (WB * RB)
Expected Return of the portfolio = (0.5x 0.05 ) +(0.5*0.16)
= 0.105
= 10.5%
Read more on variance here: brainly.com/question/10687815
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
False, it is given that Sara spends $25 for all-day ticket in the amusement park. However, this is a shuck cost that she can not recover. Moreover, she has taken one ride so marginal analysis shows that all his $25 is not wasted. She has utilized some portion of their money so we can not say that she has wasted all his money.
