Answer:
$5,140
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Uncollectible Accounts receivable = $5,800
Balance of Accounts Receivable = $108,000
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts = $660
Credit sales during the year = $166,000
Now,
Bad debt expense = Uncollectible Receivables - Allowance of doubtful debts
or
Bad debt expense = $5,800 - $660
or
Bad debt expense = $5,140
The one who will most likely have a higher BAC is the father because a person who is older will most likely have the higher BAC, as the father is already seventy five and much older to his son, he will be therefore have a higher BAC compared to his son.
Answer:
Price earning ratio= 8 times
Explanation:
Price earning ratio = Price per share /Earnings per share
Price per share = 56, EPS =?
Price per share =56, EPS = Total earnings available to ordinary shareholders/Number of shares
7,000,000/1,000,000= $7 per share
Price earning ratio = 56/7= 8 times
Price earning ratio= 8 times
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
