The Kellogg-Briand Act of 1928 was a grandiose attempt to eliminate war as an instrument of national policy. It was a bilateral nonaggression pact. While all the nations who signed the pact agreed to renounce war as an instrument of national policy, there were also a substantial number of qualifications. These qualifications were so extensive that they rendered the agreement ineffective.
George Caleb contributed to early American art by painting realistic wild animals in their natural habitats to encourage settlers to be kind to animals.
<h3>Who was George Caleb</h3>
He was a painter and artist. He created works that were made to represent American landscapes and portraits.
Much of his work was done to show representations of river life.
Read more on George Caleb here:
brainly.com/question/6473816
A pesar de haber vivido hace más de 500 años, aún se especula sobre la realidad de su vida y acciones, sobre todo las cometidas en territorio tenochca.
Su relevancia es tan grande, que el actual presidente de México, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, aún se toma tiempo de sus conferencias matutinas para hablar de las obras de Cortés. La última ocasión que lo hizo fue el 19 de noviembre, cuando aseguró que el español cometió el “primer fraude” de la historia mexicana.
The correct answer is - Kublai Khan promoted religious tolerance and exchanges between Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus.
Kublai Khan, and pretty much all the rulers of the Mongol Empire, even though mostly are portrayed as savages and barbarians, were actually one of the most tolerant of all in there time towards the different cultures and religions, and never made problems to the people they were ruling over on this basis. The Mongols can even be seen like globalists, and they encouraged cultural exchange, religious exchange and tolerance, and were trying to create an environment were people from different ethnicity, cultural and religious backgrounds would live in peace and harmony, and through it to create a unified empire.
Answer:
The legal issues are more complex than a short reply can suggest, but if states acted independently, with complete autonomy, and with no obligation to recognize the rulings in other states, citizens would not be able to determine their rights and obligations when they crossed state lines. An important constitutional basis for the obligation to recognize the judicial proceedings in other states is in Article IV, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which binds all states to "full faith and credit" for judicial proceedings in all other states.
Explanation:
have a nice day
