Answer:
It is a simple (sentence)
Explanation:
:))))))
I'm pretty sure I'm right.
First of all we can not compare Chester, a serial killer, with Joey, who committed a murder without intent, the intention defines the type of crime, and consequently the penalty that it must be met. Joey should not be considered a criminal because he has no criminal mind, and his action was not planned, in addition to having special needs, which places him in a possible state of no criminal responsibility, that will depend on the level and type of disability he possess. According to the laws, parents are not obliged to disclose their children, but there is a responsibility regarding the obstruction of justice, and his father could respond criminally. In this case, you must ask for the acquittal of the penalty for the disability, but at the same time, the clarification of the circumstances to grant justice to those affected.
Answer:
In this sentence several grammatical errors are observed:
1.chili, Amy. It is not a merged sentence
2.spoonful, the. There is an error, since the comma between two sentences creates a splice error
Explanation:
1.The explanation is that a comma is missing in the main sentence (After listening for weeks to her boyfriend, Steve bragging...), since when a sentence is in the participle it has a main sentence, therefore, you must separate both sentences with a comma.
2.The text reads that "Amy anticipated that the first delicious spoonful" is the first sentence. The hair that floated among the beef and the beans, however, killed her appetite" is the second sentence. That comma should not be because it would create a splice error between the two sentences. To solve it you can use the word "but" before "the" and eliminating “however”.
