Answer:
C) participative leadership style
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that according to path-goal theory, Nicholas Cain exhibits a participative leadership style. This is a leadership style that emphasizes participation from all employees in a company in order to make decisions. Such is the case in this scenario as Relish Corp has made a forum where the employees can voice their opinion and ideas and the decisions are made based on these inputs.
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
The metaphor of gambling, chess, and rallying related only to the degree of growing complexity and significance of different roles. In typical management needs and allocates capital, so named players. A senior executive not just uses the resource and also serves as a key motivator for both the company's so-called chess-making goals. Its successful leaders, however, not just to lead to accomplishing organizational targets, and also motivate individuals to serve a better future, and people are advised to rally to the metaphor is therefore said to have been accurate and is focused on the various positions and levels performed by the organization, thus distinguishing roles.
Based on information available, as measured in 2008, about 60 percent of U.S. trade and 60 percent of European business is intra-industry trade.
<h3>What is intra-industry trade?</h3>
The intra-industry trade is a term used in describing the commercial activities that involve the exchange of related products about the same industry.
The intra-industry trade is common in international markets where related features are exchanged between countries.
Based on the information released in 2008, the intra-industry trade takes a massive part of the USA and Europe trade, with 60 percent each.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that intra-industry trade is a common phenomenon in the international market.
Learn more about Intra-industry trade here: brainly.com/question/8495793
Answer:
consequential damages cover only reasonable foreseeable losses.
Explanation:
- The contract limits the resulting loss to lost profits from the use of the goods. The limit is not necessarily unconscious because lost profits are not necessarily significant and can be considered as direct or indirect losses.
- the contract may apply to both the lease and the sale and excluding some from the contract simply because it is a commercial loss makes no sense.
- so limit is not necessarily unconscionable because consequential damages cover only reasonable foreseeable losses.
