1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga2289 [7]
2 years ago
5

One major difference between low-income children who participated in the high scope preschool project and those that did not par

ticipate was that at age 27 years, __________.
Business
1 answer:
Ganezh [65]2 years ago
3 0

One major difference between low-income children who participated in the high-scope preschool project and those that did not participate was that at the age of 27 years, <u>those who practiced were more likely to be married and own their house</u>.

The Perry Preschool project set up the lasting human and economic price of early life schooling and caused the establishment of the HighScope education studies foundation and one of the first early formative years applications in the u.s. intentionally designed to increase faculty fulfillment for preschool.

Outcomes of the Perry Preschool program consist of: better school fulfillment; extended excessive college graduation prices amongst women; higher employment charges; better profits; and notably decrease crime fees. There were no lasting profits on checks of intellectual performance (IQ exams).

The HighScope educational research foundation research strategies for early formative years of education are primarily based on the methods of the 1962 Perry Preschool observation. It was founded in 1970 with the aid of psychologist David Weikart.

Learn more about the Perry Preschool program here brainly.com/question/25630852

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
7. Eva and Maria entered into a written contract pursuant to which Eva was to render decorating services for Maria for a total p
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

(a) Eva endorsed the check, without making any further notations on it, deposited it and sued Maria for the remaining $15,000 she claims is due. Judgment for whom?

Maria's debt is settled (cancelled) because Eva accepted the check and did not write "under protest" or "without prejudice" when she endorsed it. This debt was an unliquidated debt since maria and Eva did not agree on the total amount due, but since Eva cashed the check without writing down any type of notation with respect to their disagreement, the debt will be considered settles.

(b) Instead of the facts in (a) assume that Eva wrote "under protest" on the check when she endorsed it and, after depositing it, sues Maria for $15,000. What result?

If Eva wrote under protest, then she is not accepting Maria's payment. She is entitled to cash the check because she might need the money, but she is making it clear that she doesn't agree with the settlement. Eva could win the suit (that also depends on other factors not specified in the question).

(c) Instead of the facts in (a) and (b), assume that Eva and Maria had a telephone conversation in which Eva agreed to take $60,000 in full satisfaction of Maria’s obligation under the contract. Maria then sent the check, with a letter referencing the telephone conversation. Eva wrote "under protest" on the check, endorsed and deposited it, and then sued Maria for $15,000. What result? Explain.

Unless Maria can prove that Eva agreed with the $60,000 payment, then a court would not even consider the telephone call and the outcome would be similar to question (b). The problem with oral agreements is that one party will say this and the other party will say something else. You need some type of proof in order for an oral agreement concerning a $75,000 (or even $60,000) dispute to be valid.

3 0
3 years ago
Securitization has allowed some banks to concentrate on
arsen [322]

Securitization has allowed banks to concentrate on the safety of the money they hold. They can also give more protection for the banking transactions

5 0
4 years ago
During a conference call with the corporate office, you are told by a senior executive that you will be going abroad in the next
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

C.Clarify the situation, and ask specific questions about the overseas company's cultural and ethical practices. Also, ask what your company policies are regarding intercultural ethics.

Explanation:

In doing business with foreign cultures one needs to know the expected way transactions are conducted in the country.

A senior executive told you on conference call that you should increase expense amount because when you travel abroad for a trip you will give $5,000 each to top executives of a large account.

In your locale it may be considered bribery, but in the foreign country it may be rude not to give a gift when doing business.

So you need to clarify what acceptable ethical practices are with the foreign company.

6 0
3 years ago
In the workplace, racial discrimination is a very serious issue. Consider a company in which 20% of the employees are African-Am
Tema [17]

Answer:

a) It is expected that 8 African-Americans get promotions.

b) There is a 8.6% probability that 5 African-Americans get promotions.

c) There is a 16.2% probability that at five or less African-Americans get promotions.

d) The company may be accused of racial discrimination because the ammount of promotions given to African-Americans is much less than expected if there were no discrimination. The expected value, if there is no discrimination, of having more than 5 promotions for African American employees is 84%.

Explanation:

The question is incomplete.

Complete question:

<em>In the workplace, racial discrimination is a very serious issue. Consider a company in which 20% of the employees are African-American. At the end of the year, promotions are awarded to a group of employees. Out of the 40 promotions awarded, five are African-American. Given that the awarding follows the binomial distribution, B(40,.2).</em>

<em />

<em>a) How many African-Americans would you expect to get promotions? </em>

<em> b) What is the probability that five African-Americans receive promotions? </em>

<em> c) What is the probability that five or fewer African-Americans receive promotions? </em>

<em> d) Do you think the company is suspect of racial discrimination? Explain your thinking.</em>

<em />

a) As this situation can be modeled by a binomial distribution B(40,0.2), the expected number of African-Americans that get promotions can be calculated as the expected value of the binomial distribution:

X\sim B(40,0.2)\\\\E(X)=np=40*0.2=8

It is expected that 8 African-Americans get promotions.

b) Accordingly to the binomial distribution, we have:

P(X=5)=\frac{40!}{5!35!}*(0.2)^5*(0.8)^{35}=658008*0.00032*0.0004= 0.086

There is a 8.6% probability that 5 African-Americans get promotions.

c) We have to calculate the probabilities for X=0,1,2,3,4 and 5.

P(X\leq5)=P(X=0)+P(X=1)+P(X=2)+P(X=3)+P(X=4)+P(X=5)\\\\\\P(X=0)=\frac{40!}{0!40!}*0.2^0*0.8^{40}=1*1*0.00013=0\\\\P(X=1)=\frac{40!}{1!39!}*0.2^1*0.8^{39}=40*0.2*0.00017=0.001\\\\P(X=2)=\frac{40!}{2!38!}*0.2^2*0.8^{38}=780*0.04*0.00021=0.007\\\\P(X=3)=\frac{40!}{3!37!}*0.2^3*0.8^{37}=9880*0.008*0.00026=0.021\\\\P(X=4)=\frac{40!}{4!36!}*0.2^4*0.8^{36}=91390*0.0016*0.00032=0.047\\\\P(X=5)=\frac{40!}{5!35!}*0.2^5*0.8^{35}=658008*0.00032*0.00041=0.086

P(X\leq5)=P(X=0)+P(X=1)+P(X=2)+P(X=3)+P(X=4)+P(X=5)\\\\P(X\leq5)=0+0.001+0.007+0.021+0.047+0.086=0.162

There is a 16.2% probability that at five or less African-Americans get promotions.

d) The company may be accused of racial discrimination because the ammount of promotions given to African-Americans is much less than expected if there were no discrimination. The expected value, if there is no discrimination, of having more than 5 promotions for African American employees is 84%.

3 0
4 years ago
You plan to invest $600 in your savings account this year and then you intend to increase the amount that you invest by 3% each
koban [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is $20,211.84.

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:

Payments (PMT) = $600

Interest rate = 7%

Growth rate = 3%

Time = 16 yeras

So, future value of growing annuity can be calculated by using following formula :

FV of growing annuity = Payment × ((1+ interest rate)^n - (1 + Growth rate)^n) / (Interest rate - Growth rate)

= 600 × ((1.07)^16 - 1.03^16) / (.07 - .03)

= 600 × ( 2.95216374857 - 1.6047064391 ) / (0.04)

= 600 × 33.6864

= $20,211.84

Hence, the correct answer is $20,211.84.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Shiva returns goods worth Rs.2000 and received cash Rs.8000 ?​
    11·1 answer
  • The firm's findings are best described as the
    5·1 answer
  • why it is important to business administration student to study and know the basic principles of income taxation? ​
    10·1 answer
  • A production system uses kanban cards to control production and movement of parts. one work center uses an average of 40 pieces
    12·2 answers
  • Suppose disposable income increases by $2,000. As a result, consumption increases by $1,500. Answer the questions based on this
    15·1 answer
  • What should you do before you approach an ATM?
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose the production of electricity by a utility generates pollution that harms others. suppose also that coase bargaining loa
    9·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST <br> hi!.... so i have a question for all of you... how do you make money?
    7·2 answers
  • It is a busy Saturday in you realise that a customer who just left the store did so without getting change back hes do almost $2
    14·1 answer
  • Given that annual deposit rates for Dollars and Euros are 8% and 6% respectively for the next 5 years. If the current spot rate
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!