Answer:
Par value of bonds = $257,000
Issue price of bonds = 99
Cash receipts from issue of bonds = 257,000 x 99% = 254,430
Discount on bonds payable = Par value of bonds - Cash receipts from issue of bonds
= 257,000-254,430
= $2,570
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
March 1 Cash $254,430
Discount on bonds payable $2,570
Bonds payable $257,000
(To record issuance of bonds)
Answer:
2. marginal revenue.
Explanation:
Marginal cost is the extra expense incurred as a result of or producing or selling an additional unit. For a profit-maximizing firm, marginal cost is important as it indicates the point at which production should stop.
Marginal revenue is the income generated by the sale of an extra unit. If the marginal revenue is greater than the marginal cost, a firm will make profits if it produces and sells an extra unit.
A profit-maximizing firm should continue production until the marginal cost equal to marginal revenue. The cost associated with producing the last item should match the income from that item. Further production will result in a loss.
Answer:
Undisclosed dual agency
Explanation:
Undisclosed dual agency
Undisclosed dual agency is a dual agency relationship that is not disclosed and agreed to in writing. When sucn an incident occurs, the agent has breached his or her fiduciary responsibilities to the client, which happens to be illegal in some places it should be agreed then it is make legal by such an act.
Answer:
a) see attached image
b) Atlantis's opportunity cost of producing one helmet = 200 / 100 = 2 baseballs
c and d) Atlantis's opportunity cost of producing one baseball = 100 / 200 = 0.5 helmets
Zanadu's opportunity cost of producing one baseball = 100 / 400 = 0.25 helmets ⇒ Zanadu has a comparative and absolute advantage in the production of baseballs
e) yes, Atlantis would produce 100 helmets, and if it trades 50 to Zanadu, it will get 150 baseballs in return. So it will gain from trade. If Zanadu produces 400 baseballs and trades 150 of them for 50 helmets, it will also benefit.
Explanation:
Answer:
He was correct. It violates equal protection, as this only applies to non-residents.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about New Hampshire which adopted a tax law that in effect taxed the income of nonresidents working in New Hampshire only. Austin, a nonresident who worked in New Hampshire, claimed that the tax law was invalid. In this case, He was correct since It violates equal protection, as this only applies to non-residents. Income Tax Act can be regarded as an act that governs tax charged which applies to income of individuals, body of individuals as well as famies. The Section 1 of this Act state that tax is an obligation that needed to be fulfilled to State Inland Revenue Service in as much the the individual resides there.