Answer:
c.$37,737
Explanation:
Present value of Cost of Buying = The Cost of Press + [(Post Tax annual maintenance expenses - Annual Depreciation Tax shield)*PVIFA (6%,10)] - [Post tax Salvage Value*PVIF (12%,10)]
PV of Cost of Buying = 360000 + (3000*(1-40%)-360000/10*40%)*7.360 - 25000*(1-40%) * 0.322
PV of Cost of Buying = $262,434
Present value of Cost of Leasing = Post tax Lease Payment at the Beginning *(1+PVIFA(6%,9))
PV of Cost of Leasing = $48000*(1-40%)*(1+6.802)
PV of Cost of Leasing = $224,697
Net advantage to leasing = PV of Cost of Buying - PV of Cost of Leasing
Net advantage to leasing = $262,434 - $224,697
Net advantage to leasing = $37,737
The purchase amount that Icon Co. would record on April 2 would be: <u>c. $4,000</u>.
<h3>What is the purchase amount to be recorded?</h3>
The purchase amount that should be recorded on the date of purchase is the amount of the transaction. This does not take into account the return and discount which happened later.
This implies that Icon Co. will reduce the purchase amount on April 4 when half of the goods were returned with a contra entry. And discount will be based on the balance of $2,000 instead of $4,000.
<h3>Data and Calculations:</h3>
Purchase on April 2 = $4,000
Purchases Return on April 4 = $2,000
Thus, the purchase amount that Icon Co. would record on April 2 would be: <u>c. $4,000</u>.
Learn more about recording credit purchases at brainly.com/question/5651500
Answer:
Egor.
Explanation:
According to the Landlord-Tenant Law, the right to possess the land is owned by Egor in the given situation.
In the given scenario, Egor has a land, which he has given to Fig as an easement. An easement can be defined as a nonpossessory right to the holder of the property to earn interest on the land, originally owned by someone else. Gabe is earning profit on it and Huck has a license. Regardless of this, Egor still owns the property and has right to possess the land.
Therefore, Egor is the correct answer.
Incomplete question. The options read;
- Social identity theory
- Parasocial interaction theory
- Leader-member exchange theory
- Vigilant interaction theory
- Expectancy theory
Answer:
<u>Vigilant interaction theory</u>
Explanation:
Remember, we are told that Alexa and David kept a running total of who is winning on a whiteboard for the entire team to see while also strategizing ways to beat the opposing team.
According to the vigilant interaction theory, the productivity of a team is usually dependent upon the group's attentiveness during their group interaction.
Hence, we can thus conclude that Alexa and David are employing vigilant interaction theory to increase productivity.