Answer:
Cash + Supplies = Accounts Payable + common stock - dividends + sales commission - Rent expense.
$20,000 + 2,520 = $2,520 - $1,590 + 25,700 - $5,040 - $8,000 - $2,420 - $1,160 - $3,030 - $850
Explanation:
The effect of transaction is listed above. The effect will be on the balance sheet. These transaction have impacts on various accounts assets side is impacted and liability side is impacted. Equity is affected when there is payment of dividends and stock capital issuance.
<span>The looser interpretation of the law created a multimember executive whereas the strict interpretation created a one-person executive.
This filling in of the blanks creates an appropriate and meaningful sentence. Laws may be open to various interpretations. If "person" was thought to be a singular physical person, that would give rise to a strict interpretation for the purposes of the law and a "one-person executive". Operational definitions are important, and "person" could be interpreted as an "entity" or a "collective" in which case the looser interpretation of a law would be at play to create the "multi-member executive".</span>
Answer:
d. 9 percent
Explanation:
After 2 years the value of $10,000 at present time =
$10,000 * (1 + x / 100)^2 = $12,000
(1 + x / 100)^2 = 12,00 / 10,000
(1 + x / 100)^2 = 1.2
The square root of 1.2 is 1.0954
(1 + x / 100) = 1.0954
x = 9.54
9%( Approximately.)
Answer:
<u>Opportunity</u>
Explanation:
A code of conduct creates a formal way of how employees maintain a standard of conduct while interacting and discussing ideas.
Such a conduct is essential for any organization since it implements the abidance by rules and organizational policies treating everybody equally and ensuring just and fair treatment to all.
In the given case, an employee observes the existence of a formal code of conduct at her workplace which is not implemented consistently at all levels and covering all employees.
Such negligence in implementation would lead to an enhancement of the possibility and creates an opportunity for employees to commit unscrupulous acts, being aware of the shortcomings in the implementation of such formal code of conduct.
Answer: (i) $20 per model
(ii) $27 per model
(iii) Ginny has a comparative advantage in building models.
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
Ginny's Opportunity cost of producing one model = 
= $20 per model
Eric’s opportunity cost of building models = $20 + 35% of $20
= $20 + $7
= $27 per model
Hence, Ginny has a comparative advantage in building models because Ginny's opportunity cost of building model is lower than Eric's opportunity cost.
