The atomic bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki
What is right for me may well be wrong from someone else’s perspective. So all the answers to this question are right and wrong, probably both at the same time.
If ever, I need to make that decision, I would say that well, it depends on who the other people are. Knowing the background and history of the person for whom I am supposed to sacrifice myself if of utmost importance in this case. The question becomes infinitely interesting if the history of the other persons is not available.
If the history of other persons is available, and if its me against a bunch of criminals who have committed horrors, then definitely a BIG NO. If it’s against someone who is a much better person according to my ethical standards, then he/she deserves to live a little longer than me.
If the history of other persons is not available, then it depends on the state of mind I’m in. If I’ve been suffering from depression, and I’m not able to see any silver lining for a long time, and life itself has lost meaning to me then I will want to restart my life. In that situation, Death may seem like a good idea to make a restart.
There are just, too many “ifs” to this question. No one can say what exactly they will actually do, until they are in the situation themselves.
Answer:
Compared to brand name goods, generic food packaging displays the brand of the product at a consistently higher frequency. Also, generic food packages contain a higher ratio of brand to product name frequency, with generic packaging slightly favoring brand over product and vice versa for brand name packaging. This suggests that generic brands may be more anxious to establish themselves as brands offering a multitude of other products. Additionally, the tendency of brand name products to reference product rather than brand name is perhaps the result of a specific product having more widespread recognition than the overall brand. (For example, the Oreo cookies have far more widespread recognition than the brand itself, Nabisco.) With the exception of Malt-O-Meal, generic brands are far less likely to encourage consumers to interact with the company through internet or phone participation. I suspect that this trend is due to limited resources—generic brands may lack to funds to invest in developing a robust website or mobile phone app when these services are supplementary to their products. Brand name packaging tends to incorporate “participatory” bonus material, such as printing a game or activity on the back of the box or asking consumers to visit a website or download a mobile phone app. Generic packaging pulls ahead for featuring backstories or recipes.
