1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valkas [14]
2 years ago
12

What was the intention of SALT II?

History
1 answer:
Svetlanka [38]2 years ago
8 0

The intention of SALT II was to limit long-range missile building and increase the number of short- and mid-range missiles

<h3>What was the SALT II?</h3>

It was an acronym for second Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty It was a treaty that seeks to increased the limits on intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and heavy bombers.

Some other limits were placed by the second Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty on multiple re-entry vehicles and bombers with intermediate-range missiles.

The primary goal of SALT II was to replace the Interim Agreement with a long-term comprehensive Treaty providing broad limits on strategic offensive weapons systems.

Hence, the intention of SALT II was to limit long-range missile building and increase the number of short- and mid-range missiles

Therefore, the Option A is correct.

Read more about SALT II

brainly.com/question/901191

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Du Tisné’s major contributions to France was
Igoryamba

Answer: the correct answer is B. establishing new trade alliances with American Indian groups in Oklahoma

Explanation:

Claude-Charles Du Tisné was a French explorer in central North America, Claude-Charles du Tisné was born in France circa 1688. He became a soldier and in 1705 was posted to Canada. In 1719 he was ordered to take a small company of men to explore the Illinois country and then to go southwestward across the Mississippi River into the plains, in order to try to open trade with Santa Fe, in Spanish-held New Mexico. Historians don't agree in their evaluations of the exact route of his expedition in the summer of 1719. They agree that his line of travel brought the group into the plains directly west from the Mississippi River to an Osage village on the Osage River. By reading the expedition's reports and documents, Oklahoma historian Anna Lewis asserted that he led his men southwestward to the Verdigris River in present Oklahoma, to the site of an American Indian village, presumably of the Wichita, in the vicinity of present Chelsea or Vinita. Other scholars, notably archaeologists Mildred Mott Wedel and Waldo Wedel, read the records differently, arguing that the encounter with the Wichita took place near Neodesha, Kansas. The archaeological record, however, remains too sparse to allow a precise location of the site of the village or the explorer's route. Du Tisné's activities, and those of his fellow French explorer Jean Baptiste Bénard de la Harpe, also in 1719, paved the way for future exploration in the plains and encouraged competition between Spain and France for trade in the area. Leaving the plains, Du Tisné returned to the Illinois country, where he died in 1730.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the beating of senator sumner pull the nation apart
Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer: On May 22, 1856, the "world's greatest deliberative body" became a combat zone. In one of the most dramatic and deeply ominous moments in the Senate's entire history, a member of the House of Representatives entered the Senate Chamber and savagely beat a senator into unconsciousness. The inspiration for this clash came three days earlier when Senator Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts antislavery Republican, addressed the Senate on the explosive issue of whether Kansas should be admitted to the Union as a slave state or a free state. In his "Crime Against Kansas" speech, Sumner identified two Democratic senators as the principal culprits in this crime—Stephen Douglas of Illinois and Andrew Butler of South Carolina. He characterized Douglas to his face as a "noise-some, squat, and nameless animal . . . not a proper model for an American senator."  Andrew Butler, who was not present, received more elaborate treatment. Mocking the South Carolina senator's stance as a man of chivalry, the Massachusetts senator charged him with taking "a mistress . . . who, though ugly to others, is always lovely to him; though polluted in the sight of the world, is chaste in his sight—I mean," added Sumner, "the harlot, Slavery." Representative Preston Brooks was Butler's South Carolina kinsman. If he had believed Sumner to be a gentleman, he might have challenged him to a duel. Instead, he chose a light cane of the type used to discipline unruly dogs. Shortly after the Senate had adjourned for the day, Brooks entered the old chamber, where he found Sumner busily attaching his postal frank to copies of his "Crime Against Kansas" speech. Moving quickly, Brooks slammed his metal-topped cane onto the unsuspecting Sumner's head. As Brooks struck again and again, Sumner rose and lurched blindly about the chamber, futilely attempting to protect himself. After a very long minute, it ended. Bleeding profusely, Sumner was carried away.  Brooks walked calmly out of the chamber without being detained by the stunned onlookers. Overnight, both men became heroes in their respective regions. Surviving a House censure resolution, Brooks resigned, was immediately reelected, and soon thereafter died at age 37. Sumner recovered slowly and returned to the Senate, where he remained for another 18 years. The nation, suffering from the breakdown of reasoned discourse that this event symbolized, tumbled onward toward the catastrophe of civil war.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What consequences resulted from the U.S. government’s emphasis on loyalty?
stepladder [879]

Answer:

I think it's either jail or death

Explanation:

because loyalty is very important

8 0
2 years ago
During the cold war many countries joined the non-aligned movement in order to:
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

avoid being dominated by either the United States or the Soviet Union.

Explanation:

The Non-Aligned Movement was done by countries to try and keep their political neutrality in the Cold War. The meeting in Belgrade in 1961 made the principles regarding their cooperation and internal politics. Some of those principles would be to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all nations or abstention from intervention or interference in the internal affairs of another country.

4 0
3 years ago
how did the ancestral pueblos adapt their housing to the building materials that were available in arid southwest
Sedbober [7]

Answer: c is the correct answer

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whats The Capital of U.S
    14·2 answers
  • What was the leading city of colonial New England?
    15·2 answers
  • Why did interstate transportation become a good target for integration activities in the 1960s?
    8·2 answers
  • Which foreign policy actions did Mussolini take to strengthen Italy?
    10·1 answer
  • The ancient ___ are traditionally credited with being the discover of philosophy
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the Protestant separatists not want to pledge their loyalty to the Church of England
    5·1 answer
  • What trading goods from Asia were Europeans most interested in?
    10·1 answer
  • What was one major difference between the Commercial Revolution and the
    7·1 answer
  • Who was considered a pioneer in the field of textile technology?
    9·1 answer
  • Why were textiles and the Iron Steel industry the largest in America by 1914
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!