Neoclassical economics focuses on providing more options while Behavioral economics focuses on helping people make better decisions with the options available.
A psychological approach to business, behavioral economics looks at how well people's expectations of utility and profit maximization match their actions and if they actually maximize predicted utility.
Contrarily, neoclassical economics views manufacturing costs as a key determinant of pricing a product. Thus, neoclassical economists contend that customers' primary determinant of choice is price.
Hence, the two have different beliefs about giving people options. While behavioral economics focuses on assisting people in making better decisions with the options at hand, neoclassical economics places greater emphasis on offering more options.
Want to know how would keynesian and neoclassical economics propose dealing with cyclical unemployment? Read here: brainly.com/question/28213854
#SPJ4
Answer:
b. social influences
Explanation:
Cultural influences is when a person's culture influences his buying decision. For example, it is forbidden in some cultures to eat pork. A person from that culture would not buy pork.
Personality influences is when a person's personality influences buying decision.
I hope my answer helps you
<u>b. It can only be used for one variable at a time</u> is the false statement regarding the use of simulation in multinational capital budgeting.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The process of determining the net present value of the project is known as multinational capital budgeting. The capital budget can be determined by estimating the present value of cash flow in the project and subtracting the initial expenditure required for the projects.
When considering the use of simulation in multinational capital budgeting, it can be used for many variables at a time.
The flow of cash is focused in the long-term investment projects. Multinational capital budgeting can help in determining investment opportunity of the company.
Answer:
The answer is A.
Explanation:
Closing/Ending balance in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts = Unadjusted credit (debit) balance in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts + Bad Debt Expense
To get Bad Debt Expense, we re-write the formula:.
Closing/Ending balance in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts − Unadjusted ending credit (debit) balance in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Ending/Closing method balance in allowance for doubtful debt= $5,000
Unadjusted ending credit (debit) balance in Allowance for Doubtful Accounts =$500
So we have:
= $5,000 − $500
= $4,500