<span>The nash</span> equilibrium would be A. <span> bp and the mini-mart will both not advertise.
The nash equilibrium happens when all of the competitors choose the decision that give the optimal outcome for both of them.
If Bp and mini-mart both choose not to advertise they both will have a similar profit.</span>
Complete Question:
Jon is a cash-basis taxpayer and has adjusted gross income of $40,000 in 2018. During the year he incurred and paid the following medical expenses.
Drugs and medicines prescribed by doctors $300
Health insurance premiums $750
Doctors' fees $2,250
Eyeglasses $75
How much medical expense can he deduct as itemized deduction?
Answer:
Jon
Medical expense that Jon can deduct as itemized deduction:
= $375
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Adjusted gross income = $40,000
Incurred medical expenses:
Drugs and medicines prescribed by doctors $300
Health insurance premiums $750
Doctors' fees $2,250
Eyeglasses $75
Total = $3,375
Under Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the medical expenses which can be deducted as an itemized deduction on the federal income tax return are only to the extent that they exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI).
7.5% of $40,000 = $3,000
Therefore, Jon can itemize deduction of $375 in medical expense.
Answer and Explanation:
The identification of the following terms as an accounting principle, assumption or constraint is
1 Business entity = Assumption
2. Measurement = Principle
3 Cost-benefit = Constraint
4 Revenue recognition = Principle
In this way the identification of the accounting terms would be done
The same is relevant too
As regards media planners trying to reach a large percentage of their target audience with no limitations, this is <u>False</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The ultimate goal of a company is to reduce costs and make more profit. As a result, media planners try to keep costs as low as possible when engaging in ad campaigns.
This means that they try to reach the largest percentage of people they can reach, with limitations placed on them.
In conclusion, this is false.
Find out more on media planners at brainly.com/question/7289927.
Answer:
The company’s systemic risk level (beta coefficient) is 2.44%
Explanation:
According to Capm Expected Return of Stock = Risk Free Rate + Beta*(Market Return - Risk Free Rate)
Beta = (Expected Return of Stock - Risk freed Rate)/(Market return -Risk free Rate)
= (12.5% - 1.5%)/(6% - 1.5%)
=2.44
%
Therefore, The company’s systemic risk level (beta coefficient) is 2.44%
Systematic risk is the risk which affects all the stocks of the economy. It cannot be diversified away. Example interest rate and inflation in the economy. Beta represents systematic risk of the company.