Think about the idea here and you'll see how the idea of "cost" is inevitable in every decision. (It's true not just of governments, but of our own decisions too -- but we'll focus on governments here.)
Let's say the government decides it wants all citizens to have access to health care. Well, that's going to cost dollars to pay for that health care. Where will those dollars come from?
Let's say the government decides, in response to school shootings or other acts of gun violence, to ban certain types of guns or ammunition. That costs something to the gun dealers who were making money off those sales (and they'll object). Or let's say the government decides to do further and deeper background checks on all gun buyers. Well, that will cost something in terms of personnel and processes to accomplish all the background checks. Or let's say the government decides to increase mental health screenings and treatment because persons with mental illness issues may become violent and dangerous to society. That will cost much in order to organize and carry out better mental health intervention across the country.
I focused on just a couple issues there (health care, gun control). But the same principle holds on anything government does. You can think about your own examples that you'd want to use. Anything the government decides to do comes with some sort of costs attached. That doesn't mean it's bad to make such decisions -- it just means we need to count the cost and invest our efforts where they will have the best benefit.
Answer:
12222221222221121212122121212122122
Explanation:
In 1942, Great Britain was at the head of the British Empire, the largest Empire in known history.
At it's peak, the empire consisted of nearly 25% of the world's population, a large landmass, unmatched resources and hundreds of millions of subjects.
If the axis were able to control Great Britain, they would quite possibly have complete hegemony over the world.
Based on historical perspective, the Radical Reconstructionists attempted to maintain political and congressional control by <u>"override President's vetoes and pass the Civil Rights Act and the bill to extend the Freedmen's Bureau."</u>
During the Reconstruction era, after the end of the American Civil War, between 1863 to 1877, the Radical Reconstructionists ensured that they maintained political and congressional control. This situation occurred despite President Andrew Johnson being a southern Jacksonian Democrat.
Subsequently, the political and social impact this situation had on the southern states was that the southern states were placed under military control, and there were restrictions on political and voting rights for ex-Confederate civil officials and military officers.
Also, congress passed the 14th and 15th Amendments which granted equal protection under the law and banned voting discrimination regardless of race.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the Reconstruction era was a significant period in the history of the United States.
Learn more about the Reconstruction era here: brainly.com/question/13753522
Social Media has controlled the way teens and young adults live. It has chosen what they do with their life.
