Answer:
After the Yalta Conference of February 1945, Stalin, Churchill, and U.S. ... Germany surrendered on May 8, 1945, and the Allied leaders agreed to meet over the ... The major issue at Potsdam was the question of how to handle Germany. ... had exacted high reparations payments from Germany following World War One.
Explanation:
In World War II, the three great Allied powers—Great Britain, the United States, and ... But the alliance partners did not share common political aims, and did not ... In 1940, the two leaders worked to find ways for America to help Britain hold on .
Nonverbal communication is similar to verbal communication in four respects: it is symbolic, it is<span>rule-guided, it may be intentional or unintentional, and it reflects culture. Hope this helps</span>
Answer:
B) proactive interference
Explanation:
proactive interference is tendency of previous learning to interrupt current learning.
since here, varian's previous learning of Latin is making him difficult to grasp Greek. It can be well explained by proactive interference.
motivated forgetting happens when people try to forget certain things which they find irrelevant either unconsciously or consciously
proactive interference is phenomenon in which current learning hinders the learning of previous learnt knowledge.
temporary amnesia also known as transient amnesia is phenomenon in which a person losses memory before, during and after sometime of the event(the particular event which one is not able to remember).
Answer: This is customer to customer online marketing
Explanation:
This is a way that customers create a productive ways to interact with each other in order to trade product that can be sold online with easy access.
This means a customer has a relationship with a particular business where they buy product that they can sell online at advertise online
A third part is used to sell these product or advertise them a third part as in this case is an online platform.
Consumers are able to advocate for the quality of that product .
Answer:
The possible answers are:
A
. Yes, because his actions constituted an unlawful operation of the construction equipment.
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
C. No, because at most he could be found guilty of criminal negligence.
D. No, because he must have been aware that his conduct would cause the damage to the trailer in order to be found guilty of reckless damage.
The correct answer is:
B. Yes, because he was intoxicated while attempting to move the construction equipment.
Explanation:
The worker should be found guilty, since he was aware of being intoxicated from the beginning of the action, knowing in advance that when operating the heavy construction equipment there would be a great threat for the people and properties around. Besides, he was also aware about the alarming signs, due to the fact that he could not reach the dum truck normally, he had to jump the fence to reach it, increasing the risk with his actions.
