The federal budget process divides spending into two categories: Discretionary and Mandatory.
Discretionary spending is spending that is subject to the appropriations process, in which Congress establishes a new budget level each fiscal year. Mandatory spending is simply all spending that does not occur as a result of appropriations legislation.
Mandatory spending covers entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare, as well as mandatory interest payments on the national debt. Mandatory spending accounts for almost two-thirds of all government spending.
Discretionary spending, on the other hand, will not take place unless Congress acts each year to pay it through an appropriations bill. In several aspects of the Congressional budget process, tax legislation is viewed as Mandatory spending.
Learn more about Federal Budget here:
brainly.com/question/10959037
#SPJ1
The avant-garde productions were created by painters and sculptors to be an extension of everyday life and eliminate the boundary between performers and the audience in the happenings.
<h3>What is avant-garde?</h3>
The advant-grade can be denoted as an advance guard or fore-guard. It is used for such a person or a work that comes under the category of experimental, radical, or unorthodox with respect to art, culture, or society.
In the case of the art form, advant-grade art is the one that explores a new form. For instance, when there is an advant-grade painter is present, he will use a new and modern painting style.
Thus, in avant-garde productions elimination of the boundaries has been done.
Learn more about advant-grade from here:
brainly.com/question/27769270
#SPJ4
The complete question is attached in text form:
Which avant-garde productions were created by painters and sculptors to be an extension of everyday life and eliminate the boundary between performers and audience?
The bays are excellent for shipping, shipbuilding, and fishing
Answer:
North Carolina legislators changed coal ash storage requirements.
Explanation:
After the incident of Duke coal ash spill on February, 2014, there was a loud outcry by many people and environmental activist groups against the Duke Energy for spilling about 39,000 tons of coal ash into the Dan River.
There were numerous lawsuits against Duke Energy and the company had to pay billions of dollars as fine and reparations for the damage caused by them. As a result, the North Carolina legislators also passed a law which changed coal ash storage requirements. The law prohibited building of coal ash ponds near the state's lakes and rivers and stated that coal ash would be treated as any other industrial waste.