All categories

3 years ago

Please help! ONLY CORRECT ANSWERS PLEASE

Social Studies

2 answers:

svetlana [45]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

the is A because art was a big thing in that time

amid [387]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Here’s 2 answers you can pick which one makes more sense

Explanation:

Young men who studied under a rhetor would not only focus on public speaking. These students also learned other subjects such as geography, music, philosophy, literature, mythology and geometry. These well-rounded studies gave Roman orators a more diverse education and helped prepare them for future debates.

The goal of education in ancient Rome was to be an effective speaker. At age 12 or 13, the boys of the upper classes attended "grammar" school, where they studied Latin, Greek, grammar, and literature. At age 16, some boys went on to study public speaking at the rhetoric school, to prepare for a life as an orator.

You might be interested in

Bobbie Jo appeared to develop normally for the first year of her life, but then she began to exhibit severe isolation and commun

Nikitich [7]

Answer:

The answer is a. autism spectrum disorder.

Explanation:

This disorder, which usually appears during early childhood, presents symptoms such as difficulties in social interaction, repetitive behaviours and a tendency to be extremely organised. It is called "spectrum" because the symtpoms may vary from person to person.

The causes for this disorder are unknown, and no standard treatment has been found.

7 0

3 years ago

The failure to think independently and realistically as a group because of the desire to enjoy consensus and closeness is: A. Gr

nordsb [41]

The failure to think independently and realistically as a group because of the desire to enjoy consensus and closeness is. group think.

What do you mean by group think?

Group think is a phenomenon that occurs when the desire for group consensus overrides people's common sense desire to present alternatives, critique a position, or express an unpopular opinion. Here, the desire for group cohesion effectively drives out good decision-making and problem solving.

Why is group think important?

Group consensus can allow groups to make decisions, complete tasks, and finish projects quickly and efficiently—but even the most harmonious groups can benefit from some challenges. Finding ways to reduce group think can improve decision-making and assure amicable relationships within the group.

Characteristics of Group think:

Rationalization of decisions to minimize objections. Belief in the absolute goodness of the group. Intense dislike of outsiders – stereotyped and misleading portrayals of outside members and those who have left the group

Learn more about group think:

brainly.com/question/10698713

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago

What are examples of barrier to entry?

cupoosta [38]

Economies of Scale. This means as firms produce more their average costs fall. ...Brand Loyaly. Some firms have high degrees of brand loyalty. ...Geographical Barriers. Some Industries are specific to a certain area. ...Patents.

7 0

3 years ago

The "truly disheartened" is the term used by William Julius Wilson to describe socially isolated people who dwell in urban inner

mojhsa [17]

yes

William J. Wilson was an eminent sociologist who spent his carrer dealing with the nation's most vexing problems. Moreover, Wilson compared the poverty he and his siblings experienced with the type of concentrated urban poverty he studied For one thing, their experience with school was different than is typical in many urban poor families. Besides this, in his book "The Declining significance of Race" his main thesis was that structural changes in the job market had created a widening gap between middle-class blacks, whose fortunes were improving, and poor blacks, whose opportunities were shrinking.He was a great supporter of equality

8 0

3 years ago

Create a detailed hypothetical scenario that illustrates the concept of the adversarial system? (roughly 5 sentences?)

s2008m [1.1K]

The adversarial system or adversary system is a legal system used in the common law countries where two advocates represent their parties' case or position before an impartial person or group of people, usually a judge or jury, who attempt to determine the truth and pass judgment accordingly.[1][2][3] It is in contrast to the inquisitorial system used in some civil law systems (i.e. those deriving from Roman law or the Napoleonic code) where a judge investigates the case.

The adversarial system is the two-sided structure under which criminal trial courts operate, putting the prosecution against the defense.

<h2>please mark in brain list </h2>

3 0

2 years ago