1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
1 year ago
14

1. What is this Supreme Court chief justice nominee's main point in his opening remarks?

History
1 answer:
tester [92]1 year ago
6 0

Text of Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's opening remarks on the first day of his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which he served is this Supreme Court chief justice nominee's main point in his opening remarks.

Sandra Day O'Connor was the first woman to serve as Speaker of the State Senate, the first woman to serve on the United States Supreme Court, and the first woman to be associated with law school. , appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate to serve for life terms.

His main role is to preside over the Supreme Court, in public sessions when the Court hears arguments, and in closed meetings where cases are discussed and decided.

Learn more about Supreme Court at

brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
In what ways did germany persecute jews in the 1930s?
a_sh-v [17]

n January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler was named chancellor, the most powerful position in the German government, by the aged President Hindenburg, who hoped Hitler could lead the nation out of its grave political and economic crisis. Hitler was the leader of the right-wing National Socialist German Workers Party (called “the Nazi Party” for short). It was, by 1933, one of the strongest parties in Germany, even though — reflecting the country’s multiparty system — the Nazis had won only a plurality of 33 percent of the votes in the 1932 elections to the German parliament (Reichstag).



5 0
3 years ago
What happens during the third step? The jurors discuss the case. The lawyers present the facts. The judge states the sentence. T
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

Court System

In the case outlines that follow, each party is represented by an attorney. But this often is not the case, especially in limited jurisdiction courts. People may represent themselves in court without an attorney as long as they follow court rules. They often are called pro per, pro se, or self-represented litigants.

While this guide is intended to give a general overview of the Arizona court system and its procedures, not all cases proceed as outlined here.

Case Processing in Limited Jurisdiction Courts

Limited jurisdiction courts usually process criminal cases as follows:

1. Initial Appearance – This is the defendant’s first appearance in court, and the defendant is advised of the charges. The judge appoints an attorney if the defendant cannot afford one.

2. Arraignment – The defendant appears in court to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Many limited jurisdiction courts combine the initial appearance and the arraignment.

3. Trial – If the defendant pleads not guilty, a trial is held. The judge—or at the defendant’s request, a jury—can hear evidence on the charges and find the defendant guilty or not guilty.

4. Sentencing – If the defendant is found guilty, the court imposes the appropriate punishment (sentence).

5. Appeals – Appeals from decisions of limited jurisdiction courts go to superior court. An appeal may be heard as a new trial (a trial de novo), or the superior court judge may review records of trial proceedings if records have been kept. Decisions made in small claims court cannot be appealed.

Superior Court Case Processing

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What postponed the suffrage movement in the beginning of the 20th century?
jasenka [17]
It was primarily "D. WWI" that <span>postponed the suffrage movement in the beginning of the 20th century, since all energy and resources of the state were put towards this purpose. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hunter-gatherer societies were MOST likely led by A) a president. B) a legislature. C) respected elders. D) military committees.
Cloud [144]

i'm pretty sure that it is D, i hoped this is helpful

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does an indirect democracy differ from a direct democracy?
sertanlavr [38]

Direct Democracy talks about people’s involvement on government issues by voting directly to the issues and laws. For indirect democracy refers to the elections of official that will vote on issues regarding laws and issues. Many would rather choose direct democracy because it allows people to take part on issues.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When english ships were firing on the spanish why did the spanish try to get closer
    13·2 answers
  • How were the different stages of society organized over time?
    11·1 answer
  • What nations were carved out of Austria Hungary
    6·1 answer
  • The Eastern Theater of the Civil War was home to which of these battles?
    10·1 answer
  • Helpppppppppppppppppppp​
    9·1 answer
  • Who is a member of a Protestant church founded on the teachings of Martin Luther?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the delegates meet at the constitutional convention
    11·1 answer
  • What was a result of creating rail standardization
    8·2 answers
  • How did the beliefs of the time affect women's involvement in social reform? Answer "true" or "false" Women were not allowed to
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP TY
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!