The supreme court tends to check congress more than the president because congress passes laws, which change the way the courts work in this country, so the supreme court is a major stake holder in what gets passed through acts of congress. Most of the time, a president is checked by the court through a bill they've thrown serious political muscle behind and gotten passed through congress. Great examples of the supreme court striking down presidentially endorsed acts of congress is the court striking down the Agricultural Adjustment Administration and the national Recovery Administration that FDR pushed for as part of the New Deal. This also nearly happened in recent times with Obamacare, where several components of the bill narrowly avoided being struck down by the supreme court. The supreme court can also check executive orders. The supreme court also struck down some elements of President Trump's muslim ban in the last month.
In a short answer No..
reasoning beside that is because it gave harsh punishments to Germany. Which left them in very bad shape and made them fall into the great depression and turn to Hitler which we all know started WW2
hoped this helped ᵔᴥᵔ
I don't know is this right. hit I say because many federalist deeply resented the power of the shareholding and who appear indifferent it inflicted forgot exomic harm on a region dependent on maritime commerce
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
All of the below statement<span>s describes the corruption in the South during Reconstruction, therefore the answer is all of the above.
</span>
It took place in railway bonds.
It took place in construction contracts.
It took place in land sales.
Economic hardship and distrust of Virginia colonists who were unable to acquire land
