Answer:
The correct answer is : C. Neither breached the contract because there is no contract until Friday.
Explanation:
As the contract will only become valid when both the parties Mohan and ACME sign up and this will only happen on Friday. But as Mohan is informed by the Acme on Tuesday that they can not hire him before signing up the contract that is scheduled on Friday. Since there is no valid agreement between parties, no breach of contract occurred.
Thus, the correct answer is option C. Neither breached the contract because there is no contract until Friday.
To consider this question, we must consider the relationship between the resources and their costs.
Labor: The price that companies pay for labor is the wage. The businesses paid $68 billion for labor
Land: The price of land that business pay is rent (assuming they do not own the land). The business paid $14 billion for land.
Capital: The cost of using capital is the interest paid on that capital. The businesses paid $24 billion for using capital.
This leaves entrepreneurial ability. It is more difficult to discern the payment for this resource, as it is less tangible and thus has a less direct cost. From the payment for other resources and the total payment to households, we can infer the payment for entrepreneurial ability:
120 - 68 - 14 - 24 = $14 Billion
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, the explanation of the given situation are as follow:-
1. Ability of Contract : According to the law except of some contract a minor can enter into any contract. Mr. kalen is a seventeen year old minor and he can entered the rent contract because it is not banned by the government for the minor.
2. This is a voidable contract because Mr. Kalen is a minor and he not legally capable to entering in agreement. In voidable contract one party has a right to discontinue the contract it is depends on him that he want to void it or not. If he wants to void it he cannot be bound to go further with this contract. If a minor wants he can rightfully dis-affirm any contract in which he enters.
According to the analysis, under this circumstance, Mr. kalen is not bound to the contract because he is still minor and he shows his disaffirmance of contract by returning the key to landlord. So he is not liable for the balance of the payments due under the lease.
<span>Requirement for education promoting abstinence and monogamy.</span>
Answer:
a. Lower b. Decrease c. Surplus
Explanation:
The equilibrium wage rate is $15.
The minimum wage is fixed at $16.
a. The equilibrium wage is lower than minimum wage.
b. The higher minimum wage will lead to reduction in the number of teachers employed as the cost of hiring goes up.
c. There will be a surplus in the number of teachers, as with increased wages, the supply of teachers will be higher than demand.
