1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brilliant_brown [7]
1 year ago
9

Political forces that affect transportation businesses

Business
1 answer:
bearhunter [10]1 year ago
4 0

It is important to note that politics and the economy have effects on the transportation industry, as the industry is ever changing with new policies, regulations, or capacity issues.

Politicians and the policies they create dictate the US economy, effecting all industries. It is seen that the transportation industry saw effects because of the trade and tariff wars. The overall regulations depend largely on the economic and political outlook of the party in power.

For instance, a government that is inclined to pursue neo-liberal policies,  could pass more legislations favoring industries and big businesses, while a government inspired by socialism could push policies favoring small businesses.

Hence, the answer was given and explained above.

To learn more about politics and political party here:

brainly.com/question/12548909

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
With the federal funds rate near zero and the economy still​ struggling, the Fed began buying​ 10-year Treasury notes and certai
Korolek [52]

Answer:

The answer is: Quantitative easing

Explanation:

Quantitative easing is a type of monetary policy in which the central bank purchases predetermined quantity or amount of government securities or other financial assets to increase the supply of money, encourage lending and investment and inject liquidity into the economy. It is a unconventional monetary policy which is used when the  standard expansionary monetary policy is ineffective and during low or negative inflation.

<u>Therefore, the given policy is known as </u><u>Quantitative easing.</u>

8 0
3 years ago
Plum Corporation began the month of May with $1,400,000 of current assets, a current ratio of 1.90:1, and an acid-test ratio of
matrenka [14]

Answer:

Plum Corporation

(1) current ratio = Current assets/current liabilities

(2) acid-test ratio = (Current asset -Inventory)/Current liabilities

(3) working capital = Current assets minus Current liabilities

(4) acid-test assets = quick assets

May 2 Purchased $75,000 of merchandise inventory on credit.

Current Assets:   $1,400,000 + $75,000 = $1,475,000

Current Liabilities: $737,000 + $75,000 = $812,000

Inventory: $147,000 +$75,000 = $222,000

(1) current ratio = $1,475,000/$812,000

= 1.82:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,475,000 - $222,000/$812,000

= 1.54:1

(3) working capital = Current Assets - Current Liabilities

= $1,475,000 - $812,000

= $663,000

May 8 Sold merchandise inventory that cost $55,000 for $150,000 cash.

Current Assets: $1,475,000 -55,000 + 150,000 = $1,570,000

Current Liabilities: $812,000

Inventory: $222,000 - 55,000 = $167,000

Quick Assets = $1,570,000 - 167,000 = $1,403,000

(1) current ratio = $1,570,000/$812,000

= 1.93

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,403,000/$812,000

= 1.73

(3) working capital = $1,570,000 - $812,000

= $758,000

May 10 Collected $26,000 cash on an account receivable.

Current Assets: $1,570,000 ($26,000 - $26,000) = $1,570,000

Current Liabilities: $812,000

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,570,000 - 167,000 = $1,403,000

(1) current ratio = $1,570,000/$812,000

= 1.93

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,403,000/$812,000

= 1.73

(3) working capital = $1,570,000 - $812,000

= $758,000

May 15 Paid $29,500 cash to settle an account payable.

Current Assets: $1,570,000 - $29,500 = $1,540,500

Current Liabilities: $812,000 - $29,500 = $782,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,540,500 - 167,000 = $1,373,500

(1) current ratio = $1,540,500/$782,500

= 1.97:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,373,500/$782,500

= 1.76:1

(3) working capital = $1,540,500 - $782,500

= $758,000

May 17 Wrote off a $5,000 bad debt against the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts account.

Current Assets: $1,540,500 - $5,000 = $1,535,500

Current Liabilities: $782,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,535,500 - 167,000 = $1,368,500

(1) current ratio = $1,535,500/$782,500

= 1.96:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,535,500/$782,500

= $1.96:1

(3) working capital = $1,535,500 - $782,500

=$753,000

May 22 Declared a $1 per share cash dividend on its 69,000 shares of outstanding common stock.

Current Assets: $1,535,500

Current Liabilities: $782,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,535,500 - 167,000 = $1,368,500

(1) current ratio = $1,535,500/$782,500

= 1.96:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,535,500/$782,500

= $1.96:1

(3) working capital = $1,535,500 - $782,500

=$753,000

May 26 Paid the dividend declared on May 22.

Current Assets: $1,535,500 -$69,000 = $1,466,500

Current Liabilities: $782,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,466,500 - 167,000 = $1,299,500

(1) current ratio = $1,466,500/$782,500

= 1.87:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,299,500/$782,500

= 1.66:1

(3) working capital = $1,466,500 - $782,500

= $684,000

May 27 Borrowed $120,000 cash by giving the bank a 30-day, 10% note.

Current Assets: $1,466,500 + $120,000 = $1,586,500

Current Liabilities: $782,500 + $120,000 = $902,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,586,500 - 167,000 = $1,419,500

(1) current ratio = $1,586,500/$902,500

= 1.76

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,419,500/$902,500

= 1.57

(3) working capital = $1,586,500 - $902,500

= $684,000

May 28 Borrowed $135,000 cash by signing a long-term secured note.

Current Assets: $1,586,500 + $135,000= $1,721,500

Current Liabilities: $902,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,721,500 - 167,000 = $1,554,500

(1) current ratio = $1,721,500/$902,500

= 1.91:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,554,500/$902,500

= 1.72

(3) working capital = $1,721,500 - $902,500

= $819,000

May 29 Used the $255,000 cash proceeds from the notes to buy new machinery.

Current Assets:  $1,721,500 - $255,000 = $1,466,500

Current Liabilities: $902,500

Inventory: 167,000

Quick Assets = $1,466,500 - 167,000 = $1,299,500

(1) current ratio = $1,466,500/$902,500

= 1.62:1

(2) acid-test ratio = $1,299,500/$902,500

= 1.44:1

(3) working capital = $1,466,500 - $902,500

= $564,000

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

May 1, Current Assets = $1,400,000

Ratio of current assets to current liabilities = 1.90:1

Acid -test ratio = 1.70:1

Therefore, current liabilities = $1,400,000/1.9 = $737,000

Current Assets minus Inventory/$737,000 = 1.7

Therefore, current assets minus inventory = $737,000 * 1.7 = 1,253,000

Inventory = Current Assets - (Current assets -inventory)

= $1,400,000 - $1,253,000

= $147,000

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Imagine that you are the CEO of Wal-Mart. Pick three ways discussed in this section to explain how you would improve customer se
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

make sure workers aren't slacking and helping customers

4 0
3 years ago
What are the verbs in this sentence their fur helps them defend themselves
LenKa [72]
Helps and defends.......................
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what situations is top-down planning likely to be superior to bottom-up emergent strategy development
Marianna [84]

Answer is given below :

Explanation:

  • Both strategies aim to convey and process knowledge between and within the organization. The top-down approach for sub-categories to gain insights at the senior management level breaks down a system.
  • This is a great tool to help managers identify areas of improvement using quota and monthly matrix goals. There are flaws in this strategy, employees are not involved in the process and managers do not understand the full impact of the changes made.
  • Morality can be affected because this strategy is motivated by fear and encouragement. The bottom line is that in some cases it is more complex, although employees feel motivated to provide more authority and quality work. The information is processed to a minimum and communicated to management.
  • This may help in some areas because administrators may not fully understand the process. I should use the military as an example for a top down strategy.
  • It works on the battlefield when there is no time to discuss or motivate employees. Top down is used when there is a slight change in environmental factors.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose a commercial banking system has $240,000 of outstanding checkable deposits and actual reserves of $85,000. If the reserv
    10·1 answer
  • True or false: savings accounts generally offer a higher yield than money markets.
    11·2 answers
  • Frontier Airlines hedged the cost of jet fuel by purchasing options that allowed the airline to buy fuel at a fixed price for 2
    9·1 answer
  • Ezra is comparing two checking accounts. One has a monthly fee of $8 and a per-check fee of $0.20, and the other has a monthly f
    11·2 answers
  • Answer the question on the assumption that the legal reserve ratio is 20 percent. Suppose that the Fed sells $500 of government
    13·1 answer
  • "Consider the futures contract written on the S&amp;P 500 index and maturing in one year. The interest rate is 3%, and the futur
    8·1 answer
  • On StatSim, how does a firm get their market share to increase?
    15·1 answer
  • Finance professionals make decisions that fall into three distinctive areas: corporate finance, capital markets, and investments
    7·1 answer
  • What is the difference between an absorption spectrum and a standard curve?.
    14·1 answer
  • Describe how crashing and fast tracking can be used to compress a project schedule. What limitations could there be with each of
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!