It is an example of
Ichabod Crane’s vanity.
In that particular scene, he was dressed in an excessive manner, or in a
fancy way. Perhaps it was just that he had a high opinion of himself that’s why
he had gained a lot of confidence to speak louder.<span>
</span>
Answer:
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BLACKOUT
Explanation:
If all traffic signal lights are not working because of an electrical power failure, you must stop at the intersection and then proceed when you know other turning and approaching vehicles, bicycles, or pedestrians have stopped.
Answer:13
Explanation:
Given
During a local campaign 8 republicans and 5 democratic candidates are nominated for president of the school Board.
If the president is to be one of these candidates then
there can be ways to select a president
can be expanded to
therefore
Therefore there can be 13 ways to do it.
At the PR firm where Gerald works, everyone considers him to be very good with his work and depends heavily on his knowledge to help the organization to solve its problems. Gerald is often seen teaching interns a simpler way to present an article, helping project managers with scheduling, and even the CEO often asks him for his opinion on important matter because of his experience and skill. Gerald's specialized knowledge depicts his expert power.
Full Question:
Jane operates a home decorations shop selling slightly used goods. She bought a painting from Sally for the shop. Bob came into the shop and asked if the painting was by Bill, a local artist of some repute. Jane, without checking with Sally, says, "I'm sure it is" because she really did think it looked like one of Bill's paintings. Bob bought the painting. A week or so later, he took the painting by Bill's studio. Bill just laughed and said that he never painted anything that horrible. Bob took the painting back to Jane and asked for a refund. Jane refused on the basis that she never gave refunds and that Bob took the risk that the painting was not done by Bill. Should Bob sue in small claims court, who will likely win and why?
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
b. Bob, on the basis of innocent misrepresentation.
c. Bob, on the basis of a unilateral mistake.
d. Jane, on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss.
e. Jane, both on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss and that he agreed by an oral contract to purchase the painting.
Answer:
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
Explanation:
Negligent misrepresentation
occurs when someone makes a statement without making sure this statement is based on true facts. Negligent misrepresentation happens when a person may not lie directly (saying something knowing it to be untrue), but makes a statement about something with no factual backing. Bob will likely win here because Jane "assumed" the painting was from Bill without confirming it was.