Your answer would be "Peril"
True… explanation: every workplace has different workers, environments, and criterias/operations
The year 2020 had a big impact on the economy due to the global pandemic, also having an impact on the annual income of families, so if your father or mother, for example, receive fixed salaries and tips, they probably felt the impacts of the economic recession.
<h3>
</h3><h3>How the pandemic affected the economy
</h3>
The rates of infection by the virus and mortality generated a scenario of insecurity that led to a public decision to stop consumerism in order to restrict resources and be able to adopt an effective strategy in a period of great uncertainty.
Therefore, with the measures adopted by the government, such as social isolation, many companies stopped producing, closed for a while and were unable to survive without generating profits.
The impact of the pandemic then led to an economic downturn in several countries and caused thousands of people to lose their jobs or businesses.
To change this scenario, it is necessary to implement public policies with strategies to create jobs, reduce bureaucracy, invest and encourage industry.
Find out more information about public policies here:
brainly.com/question/2595599
Answer: Communication and well-developed people skills
Explanation:
Since the team comprises of workers who come from different countries, the best tool is the communication and well developed people skill.
These skills are vital when interacting and communicating with others. Since they're from different countries, communication skill is required to build a relationship with them, motivate them and achieve organizational goals.
Answer:
Option C Interviews should focus on skills that can be measured in an interview better than on a test.
Explanation:
The reason is that the person's intelligence is though in problem solving skills but this can also be done by questioning the person in areas where they can better extract information out of the person rather than using tests and by noticing his reactions and problem solutions offered. This means that the tests though helps in finding the intelligent person but it doesn't helps much because the willingness, eager to do things done and a pro-activeness of the person is everything. And these skills comes out when the person speaks in front of a recruiter which analyzes his behavior, his beliefs about things and many other things which gets clear overtime. So the basic mistake here by the management was poor way of extraction of information out of candidates.
