Answer:
$29,280
Explanation:
It is important to consider only cash transactions when preparing a Cash Reconciliation.
<u>Schultz Tax Services Cash Reconciliation</u>
Cash, June 1 $25,000
<u>Plus: cash receipts for June</u>
Receipts for Accounting Services $3,000
Receipts from Accounts Receivables $3,800 $6,800
<u>Minus: cash payments for June</u>
Advertising expense paid $800
Dividends paid $1,500
Telephone expense paid $220 ($2,520)
Cash, June 30 $29,280
Conclusion :
The balance of Cash at June 30 is $29,280
Answer:
sunk cost
Explanation:
Sunk cost is cost that has already been incurred and it cannot be recovered. When making future decisions, sunk cost should not be considered.
The money i paid for the ticket is the sunk cost. I should not consider this cost when making the decision of whether to for the concert or not to
Answer:
1. buy more salads and fewer sandwiches.
Explanation:
As we know that
Therefore
Now the price ratio is
It is probable if you rising marginal utility numbering and reduce denominator marginal utility. If you reduce their intake, the MU of a food item will raise. Such decrease in the composition would make the quantity of the food element scarce. And its usefulness goes up. The Numerator here is sandwich MU. And to increase their marginal utility, you can reduce sandwich consumption.
Salad should need just the reverse. You raise salad intake so the MU reduces. Therefore you have to eat more salads and less chicken sandwiches to maximise the utility. So, salad is replaced by sandwiches for chicken.
Answer:
141,667 units
Explanation:
The sales less the variable cost gives the contribution margin. The contribution margin less the fixed cost gives the net operating income.
As such, the net operating income/loss is the difference between the sales and the total costs
.
Let the amount of sales in units be y then,
250y - 130y - 1,500,000 = 200,000
120y = 1,700,000
y = 1700000/12
= 141,667 units
Answer:
After observing the question, there are blank spaces to fill in the question. These blank spaces are to be filled with the right answers. Since it was not shown in the question, I will write out the question again and appropriately add the answers for proper understanding. I hope it helps.
In order to qualify as substantial performance, the party who fails to perform perfectly must perform <u>in good faith</u>. <u>Intentional</u> failure to comply with the contract terms is a <u>breach</u> of the contract. The performance must not vary greatly from the promised performance: an omission, variance or defect in performance is considered <u>minor</u> if it can be <u>remedied</u> by compensation. finally, the performance must create substantially the same <u>benefits</u> as those promised in the contract.
