All categories

1 year ago

Which of the following statements best describes a difference between HR

Business

1 answer:

Rainbow [258]1 year ago

8 0

The option that best describes the difference between HR planning and a staffing plan is this:

B. Unlike HR planning, a staffing plan identifies only the company's present hiring needs.

<h3>What is the difference between HR planning and staffing?</h3>

The difference between the two mentioned concepts lies in the fact that HR planning is a long-term plan that is aimed at trying to understand how the staffing needs of the company can be improved for better success.

Unlike HR planning, a staffing plan is aimed at identifying the immediate employment needs of the company and filling them up. In businesses, HR planning is very vital to building sustainability. Staffing is also important but it only considers the interim.

So, the difference between these two concepts can be pinned down to the time factor. While one satisfies a need immediately, the other looks at the future and makes reasonable plans that ensure sustainability.

Learn more about HR planning here:

brainly.com/question/13761208

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Devon invested $10,500 in three different mutual funds. A fund containing large cap stocks made a 6.7% return in 1 yr. A real es

madreJ [45]

Answer:

Amount invested in a fund containing large cap stocks = $6,000

Amount invested in a real estate fund = $1,500

Amount invested in a bond fund = $3,000

Explanation:

Let:

x = Amount invested in a fund containing large cap stocks = 4 * y = 4y

y = Amount invested in a real estate fund

z = Amount invested in a bond fund =

For total amount invested, we have:

T = total amount invested = x + y + z = $10,500

Therefore, we have:

4y + y + z = $10,500

5y + z = $10,500 ……………………….. (1)

From equation (1), we have:

z = 10,500 - 5y …………………….(2)

Also, for the net returns, we have:

6.7%x - 15.6%y + 4.9%z = $315

0.067(4y) - 0.156y + 0.049z = 315

0.268y - 0.156y + 0.049z = 315

0.112y + 0.049z = 315 ………………… (3)

Substitute equation (2) for z in equation (3), we have:

0.112y + 0.049(10,500 - 5y) = 315

0.112y + 514.50 - 0.245y = 315

0.112y - 0.245y = 315 - 514.50

-0.133y = -199.50

y = -199.5 / -0.133

y = 1,500

x = 4y = 4 * 1,500 = 6,000

From equation (2), we have:

z = 10,500 - 5y = 10,500 - (5 * 1,500) = 3,000

Therefore, we have:

Amount invested in a fund containing large cap stocks = $6,000

Amount invested in a real estate fund = $1,500

Amount invested in a bond fund = $3,000

Checking this, we have:

Total amount invested = $6,000 + $1,500 + $3,000 = $10,500

8 0

2 years ago

Which two advantages do home buyers have over renters?

Snowcat [4.5K]

Answers A and E seem correct. B makes no sense. C makes no sense. and my renters insurance was very cheap vs property insurance.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A case comes before a Wisconsin state trial court on the subject of free speech on the Internet. It is a case of first impressio

sp2606 [1]

Answer:

The correct answer would be option B, Judge's own personal feelings about the internet.

Explanation:

When a case comes to a court, it is the responsibility of a judge to see every aspect of the case and analyze it on the basis of given evidence or set rules or standards, or in the light of decisions made on the same case by other courts. But in this question, it is said that the case which was brought to the court was the first in its kind, it means no such type of case has been ever submitted in any court before. The freedom of speech on internet is a sensitive issue. So all aspects should be kept in mind while proceeding the case, and it would not be considered proper for the judge to bring his person feelings about the internet into the case. His personal feelings should be set aside and the case should be solved on the basis of evidences and solid views.

3 0

3 years ago

A. A stock's returns have the following distribution:

babunello [35]

Answer:

Following are the response to the given question:

Explanation:

For question 1:

The weighted average of each return is the expected return.

$Expected\ return = 0.1 \times -0.22 + 0.2 \times -0.12 + 0.3 \times 0.17 + 0.2 \times 0.33 + 0.2 \times 0.56 \\\\$

$= 0.1830 \\\\= 18.30\%$

For question 2:

Standard deviation is a measured source of the square deviations from the mean via probability.

$Std \ dev = [0.1 \times (0.183-(-0.22))^2 + 0.2 \times (0.183-(-0.12))^2 + 0.3\times(0.183-0.17)^2 + 0.2\times (0.183-0.33)^2 + 0.2\times (0.183-0.56)^2]^{(\frac{1}{2})}\\\\$

$= 0.2596 \\\\= 25.96\%$

For question 3:

For point a:

$\text{Coefficient of variation} = \frac{std \ dev}{expected\ return} \\\\$

$=\frac{0.2596}{0.183} \\\\= 1.42$

For point b:

As per the CAPM: $\text{Required return = risk free rate + beta}\times \text{market risk premium}$

$\to 16\% = 4.5\% + beta\times 5\%\\\\\to beta = 2.3$

In Option I:

When the beta of the stock exceeds 1.0, the change in the required rate of return must be higher than the increase in the premium of market risk. Beta is the degree to which stock return changes as market returns change.

$\text{Required return = risk free rate + beta}\times \text{market risk premium}$

$Required \ return = 4.5\% + 2.3\times 7\%\\\\Required \ return = 20.6\%\\\\$

5 0

3 years ago

Assume that in the year 2010, the US Nominal GDP was $15 trillion, while the GDP deflator was 200. Calculate the US Real GDP for

oksian1 [2.3K]

Assume that in the year 2010, the US Nominal GDP was $15 trillion, while the GDP deflator was 200. US Real GDP for 2010 is 7.5%.

Using this formula

GDP=Nominal GDP/GDP deflator×100

Where:

Nominal GDP=$15 trillion

GDP deflator=200

Let plug in the formula

GDP=$15 trillion/200×100

GDP=7.5%

Therefore US Real GDP for 2010 is 7.5%.

Learn more about Real GDP here:brainly.com/question/6348208

3 0

2 years ago