Answer:
Fifo Inventory $665
Moving Average= $ 606
Lifo Inventory $ 592
Explanation:
Purchases
Date Units Unit Cost Sales Units Fifo Inventory
July 1 13 $115
<u>July 6 9 </u>
<u> 4 $115 $460</u>
July 11 6 $122
<u>July 14 6 </u>
<u> 4 $122 $488</u>
July 21 7 $132
<u>July 27 6 </u>
<u> 5 $ 133 </u><u> $665</u>
<u />
Moving Average Method
= Total Cost of Purchases/ No of items= 13*115 + 6*122+ 7*132/13+6+7
= 1495+ 732+ 924/26= 3151/26= 121. 192
No of units in the Ending Inventory= 5 * 121.192= $ 605.96
Purchases
Date Units Unit Cost Sales Units Lifo Inventory
July 1 13 $115
<u>July 6 9 </u>
<u> 4 $115 $460</u>
July 11 6 $122
<u>July 14 6 </u>
<u> 4 $115 $460</u>
July 21 7 $132
<u>July 27 6 </u>
1 132 $132
<u> 4 $ 115 $460</u>
<u> 5 </u><u> $ 592</u>
Answer:
Total cost of Job A3B= $31,900
Explanation:
Job A3B was ordered by a customer on September 25.
The company applies overhead at a rate of 100% of the direct labor cost incurred.
Cost of September:
$3,400 of direct materials
$4,900 of direct labor.
$4,900 manufactured overhead
Total= $13,200
Cost of October:
$3,900 of direct materials
$7,400 of direct labor
$7,400 manufactured overhead
Total= $18,700
Total cost of Job A3B= 13,200 + 18,700= $31,900
Answer:
Change in US external wealth between periods T and T +1 in dollars = -$100
Explanation:
Since nothing else changes, this implies that the exchange rate per yen is $0.01 in periods T and T +1. Therefore, we have:
Value shares of Sonic in period T in dollar = Number of shares of Sonic bought in period T * Price per share of Sonic in Yen in period T * Exchange rate per yen in periods T = 100 * 700 * $0.01 = $700
Value shares of Sonic in period T+1 in dollar = Number of shares of Sonic in period T+1 * Price per share of Sonic in Yen in period T+1 * Exchange rate per yen in period T+1 = 100 * 600 * $0.01 = $600
Change in US external wealth between periods T and T +1 in dollars = Value shares of Sonic in period T+1 in dollar - Value shares of Sonic in period T in dollar = $600 - $700 = -$100
Answer:
B. negative, positive
Explanation:
Substitution effect : Price rise of a good makes it relatively expensive, decreases its demand. Price fall of a good makes it relatively cheap, increases its demand.
So: Substitution Effect is always negative as per above explanation.
Income Effect : Price rise of a good decreases real income/ real purchasing power of consumer & reduces demand of all goods. Price fall increases real purchasing power & increases demand of all goods.
Income effect is positive in case of Normal Goods, normal good demand is positively related to income. The effect is negative in case of inferior goods, inferior good demand is negatively related to income.
Hence: Price rise of rice - Substitution effect results in negative change in rice consumption. {∵substitution effect always negative}
Income Effect leads to positive change in rice consumption {∵price rise reduces real income & income effect is negative for inferior goods}
Monetary policy is the best way to influence economic growth.
Appeared as a leader of the Chicago school of financial economics, Friedman burdened the importance of the quantity of cash as a device of government coverage and a determinant of enterprise cycles and inflation. His monetarism principle proposed that cash delivery modifications have immediate and long-term effects.
Milton Friedman became a U.S. economist and Nobel laureate known as the most influential propose of loose-marketplace capitalism and monetarism in the 20th century.
The monetarist principle is an monetary concept that contends that changes in cash deliver are the maximum good sized determinants of the charge of monetary increase and the behavior of the commercial enterprise cycle.
Learn more about economic growth here brainly.com/question/1690575
#SPJ4
