All categories

1 year ago

Is it ethical for a Realtor to represent buyer and seller?

Business

1 answer:

Korolek [52]1 year ago

4 0

<u>Yes, that's allowed</u> to ethical for a Realtor to represent buyer and seller.

<h3>Briefing:</h3>

Transaction brokerage describes the circumstance to which you're referring. When your real estate professional represents a buyer client who is interested in buying the property in which you are the seller client, this service option is known as transaction brokerage.

<h3>Who is a called buyer?</h3>

In a buyer's call, a buyer and seller agree to purchase a commodity at a set price that is higher than the price of a futures contract for the same grade and quantity.

<h3>Who is called a seller?</h3>

Any person or organization that makes any kind of good, service, or financial asset available for purchase is a seller. Short selling is obtaining securities that are not one's own to sell in order to purchase them back at a cheaper cost. The term "writer" refers to a person who sells options and receives the premium from the buyer.

To know more about buyer and seller visit:

brainly.com/question/17217405

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Which of the following would cause a leftward shift of the supply curve for computers? A. an increase in the price of printed ci

Margaret [11]

Answer:

The answer is A.

Explanation:

All other things being equal, an increase in the cost of production of a product will decrease the units of the product being reduced and this reduction in supply shifts the supply curve to left while a decrease in the cost of production will increase the units of the product being produced and this shifts the supply curve to the right.

Printed circuit boards is one of the materials used to build computers and since the price has increased, the cost of producing computer also increases and this will make the producers to produce less, shifting the supply curve to the left.

6 0

3 years ago

. Dallas Wildcat Drilling Co. sells an oil-drilling rig for $3,000,000. The drilling rig was purchased in 2013 for $2,000,000. D

olga2289 [7]

Answer:

$2,200,000 gain

Explanation:

When the amount received from the disposal of an asset is lower than the carrying or net book value (NBV) of the asset, the company makes a loss on disposal otherwise, the company makes a gain on disposal.

The carrying amount of the asset is the difference between the asset's cost and accumulated depreciation as at the date of disposal.

Asset NBV = $2,000,000 - $1,200,000

= $800,000

Gain/(loss) on disposal = $3,000,000 - $800,000

= $2,200,000

5 0

3 years ago

A sudden stop will be easier to navigate if the country borrows internationally in foreign currencies and lend locally in its do

natulia [17]

Answer: False

Explanation:

A sudden stop refers to the sudden decline in net capital inflows in the economy from outside. This is a significant method by which the economy can have access to foreign exchange.

If the country therefore borrows internationally in foreign currencies whilst lending in domestic currency, the sudden stop will be difficult to navigate because it will impair the country's ability to pay off the international creditors it has because it will not have enough of the required foreign currency to pay them.

8 0

2 years ago

Is the sales manager a subordinate? explain why?

Dafna1 [17]

Depending on your use of marketing and sales as complementary or subordinate functions, you can create a management structure that ensures no important duties fall through the cracks.

8 0

3 years ago

For Year 2, Etzkorn Corporation's sales were $1,480,000, its gross margin was $580,000, its net operating income was $63,714, it

mixer [17]

Answer:

Return on equity = Net income/Shareholders' equity x 100

= $29,600/$829,000 x 100

= 3.57%

The company's return on equity is closest to 3.67%

Explanation:

Return on equity is the ratio of net income to shareholders' equity. The net income = $29,600 and shareholders' equity = $829,000. The division of net income by shareholders' equity gives return on equity.

6 0

3 years ago