Answer:
<em>A. Big steel, a metal manufacturer that has negligible market share in a slow-growing industry</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
geographically to encompass the 12 largest metropolitan and financial areas in the United States.
Explanation:
When the Federal Reserve District Banks were to be divided there were huge discussions on such division but it was later discovered that important places and cities should get their separate divisions.
Accordingly, it was divided into 12 segments which shall cover the most vital economic centres and the most needful shall be served first.
And thus, the metropolitan and financial centres of United States got their area specific divisions.
When you are valuing a stock, proper research must be done on the company's anticipated future growth rate which must be most careful about when performing your calculations.
When the case of deciding on which valuation method is to be used for the first time to value stock as it is actually easy to get overwhelmed by various valuation techniques available for the investors. Fairly straightforward valuation techniques are also present, however, other techniques are more involved and complicated.
In general, there is actually no particular method that is best suited for every situation to make performed. Since each stock is different and each industrial sector or firm exhibits unique characteristics it may be required to process valuation methods which are in multiple cases.
Due to many factors to be considered while stock valuation, it must be done on basis of the complete anticipated future growth rate of the company. This should be done carefully based on proper research on the future growth of the particular company to perform calculations of stock valuation.
Learn to know more about a Total Cost of a stock purchase on
brainly.com/question/17587674
#SPJ4
Price elasticity demand = change in demand with respect to change in price
Price elasticity demand = abs[{($0.88-$0.99)/$0.88x 100}/{(513-249)]/513x100}
= 12.5% increase in price/ decrease of 40.16% passengers.
This method of increasing the ticket price is not feasible because the bus service is elastic, which means a small change in the ticket price of $0.11 or 12.5% would mean huge effect on decreasing the number of passengers of 40% or 264 riders reducing the income considerably. By doing the opposite, the bus company will decrease the ticket price to $0.77 in effect the number of riders will increase to 777 thus will make an income increase of 31.86% or $143.85. With this comparison of data, I would suggest the bus company would decrease the ticket price instead of increasing it.
