No, the anecdotal verbal account from this witness be valid scientific evidence of the event because "independent follow-up tests cannot confirm it. "
<h3>What are scientific methods?</h3>
In the sciences, scientific methods, mathematical and experimental techniques are used. It is the methodology used in the creation and evaluation of a scientific hypothesis.
Some key features regarding the scientific method are-
- The scientific method is essential for developing scientific theories that explain empirical (experimental) laws in an empirically rational manner.
- In a typical scientific method application, a researchers formulated a hypothesis, tests it using various methods, and then modifies this same hypothesis based on the results of the experiments and tests.
- The modified hypothesis then is tested again, and again, until it is consistent with demonstrated phenomena and testing results.
- Hypotheses, in this sense, serve as tools for scientists to collect data.
- Scientists can create broad general interpretations, or theories, based on that data and the numerous scientific investigations conducted to investigate hypotheses.
To know more about scientific method, here
brainly.com/question/17216882
#SPJ4
The complete question is -
The scientific method works well when it is used properly, but ignoring the rules, not looking at results in an objective manner, and flat-out cheating can lead to bad science. We must therefore be careful along every step of the scientific process, including the selection of which evidence to consider for a hypothesis.
Consider the following scenario: A person sees a UFO in the middle of the night while walking alone on the beach. No other evidence of the UFO is left behind at the scene.
Would the anecdotal verbal account from this witness be valid scientific evidence of the event?
