I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
How they draw the characters on the computer and how the make a 3d affect
The best example of people modifying their environment is the construction of cities, where homes and offices for working are built as well as plantation to provide food to community.
Answer:
Collective efficacy.
Explanation:
Cohesive communities with high levels of social control and social integration and where people develop interpersonal ties are also likely to develop <em>collective efficacy</em>. Collective efficacy is the capacity of a community to control the behavior of individuals and group that belong to the community. In these cohesive communities, members monitor children's behavior when in public spaces. They also prevent adolescents from hanging on street corners. The community creates a controlled and safe environment where criminal deeds are less likely to occur.
