The Federalist Party was in service between 1798 and 1801, and the Democratic-Republican Party was in service between 1792 and 1798.
The Federalist Party were proponents of a strong, centralized national government and a strong executive branch. Federalists did not support a Bill of Rights, supported an economy based on agriculture, believed that the Constitution was open to interpretation, and asserted that the government had the right to adopt additional powers. In foreign policy, Federalists sided with the British and opposed the French Revolution. Federalists supported Alexander Hamilton.
The Democratic-Republican Party were in support of a weak, centralized government fearing that a strong central government would lead to tyranny. The DR Party supported the Bill of Rights to supplement the Constitution in order to support the people. They believed the Constitution was a strict document that limited the federal government's ability to adopt additional powers. The DRP often aligned itself with France and admired the French's Revolution.
<em>Jonathan Swift's Modest Proposal</em> crosses the line into ludicrous territory when he suggests that Irish children should become delicacies for their English Lords.
<h3>What are the main points of Jonathan Swift's Modest Proposal?</h3>
The main points of <em>Jonathan Swift's Modest Proposal</em> included:
- The amelioration of poverty in Ireland by butchering Irish children
- Selling the butchered children as food to wealthy English landlords
- Solving the problem of the homeless youth in Ireland by unconventional means
- The offer of cannibalism as a means of solving Ireland's social and political ills
- A mockery of the political opinions and ineffectual remedies proposed by others.
Thus, <em>Jonathan Swift's Modest Proposal</em> crosses the line into ludicrous territory when he suggests that Irish children should become delicacies for their English Lords.
Learn more about <em>A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift</em> at brainly.com/question/10121048
#SPJ12
<span>o ask a still more obvious question, what is the purpose of this technological progress? What higher aim do we think it is serving? Surly the aim cannot be the integrity or happiness of our families, which we have made subordinate to the education system, the television industry, and the consumer economy. Surely it cannot be the integrity of health of out communities, which we esteem even less than we esteem our families. Surly it cannot be love of our country, for we are far more concerned about the desecration of the flag than we are about the desecration of our land. Surly it cannot be the love of God, which counts for at least as little in the daily order of business as the love of family, community, and country.</span>
Seven thirds times three- fourteens
Answer:
These factors explain why the value of a resource may be firm idiosyncratic. Resource value, thus, is a function of both internal (the firm's resource base and its managers' characteristics) and external factors (the firm's market position and customers valuing the firm's output, as well as access to information)
Explanation:
