The deed Scott v stand Ford case established that those who were black did not have the right to citizenship regardless of if they were free or enslaved. It also had an opinion which stated that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional.
1. We can analyze the possible social benefits or consequences by creating a standard that deemed as 'desirable' social situation and measures the situation before and after the militarization.
If after the militarization our society got closer to the desirable outcome, we would say that the militarization produces a social benefit.
2. We could take a look at the example of American military occupation in Iraq.
Initially, we intended for the militarization to create a democratic country in iraq after we remove the dictator from power.
But it only resulted in a vacuum that attract many radical groups to came in to control the country. In this case, we can conclude that the militarization produce more consequences than benefit.
A. is the answer a shortage depends on a single market and has a varying duration while scarcity is the idea that all things are scarce always
I believe the answer is: <span>It could not be reduced to its basic elements
Phi phenomenon refers to the optical illusion that make a person see a series of non-moving image as if it's making a motion if it's seen in rapid succession. This indicates that the perception is created from the combination of many sense at once</span>
